BajaNomad

Choral Pepper's 'LOST' MISSION SITE: FOUND! (What do you think it is?)

 Pages:  1  

David K - 1-4-2009 at 10:17 AM

Dear Friends,

It is with great excitement that I share this with you...

The mysterious site of walls, a dam, a palm tree, Indian sleeping circles are ALL there... just the way Choral Pepper reported in her July, 1966 Desert Magazine and her 1973 Baja book!!! Choral believed the site was a mission shown only on one Jesuit (1757) map as 'started' by the name of Santa Maria Magdalena.

Choral and I spoke often of her desire to go back and find that site that she could not recall the exact location of. I have also spoken to Bruce Barber, J.W. Black, and Ricardo Castillo who were on the Erle Stanley Gardner expedition of February, 1966. None could recall where the walls and dam were, other than south of L.A. Bay and north of El Barril.

The site was seen after they visited Bahia las Animas to get clams for dinner. They were opening an abandoned road as well as creating a new road south, in the La Bocana valley, in order to get through to the El Arco/ San Francisquito road.

Since my meetings with Choral some seven plus years ago, I made six trips into the region searching for her 'lost mission' of Santa Maria Magdalena. One of those trips I drove right by it! I have links to the photos taken on previous searches ( in 2001-2004) on this page: http://vivabaja.com/1757/page2.html

Choral had hoped I would someday find it... No, she 'knew' I would find it... and with a great tip by Nomad member 'Sharksbaja' who saw some walls on the Google Earth satellite images and sent them to me... Elizabeth and I went there... and THERE it was!!! It was no easy task getting to them, and I have some fresh scars to show for it!

I have attached the photos from 1966, the mission as listed in Tom Miller's 'The Baja Book', and a couple photos we took this past Friday.

A big thank you to Choral Pepper for sharing the 1966 discovery in her magazine and book as well as her personal inspiration and enthusiasm.

Without the tip from 'Sharksbaja' (Corky), who knows when I would have found it?... THANK YOU CORKY!!! This has been one of the greatest Baja experiences I have ever had!

Many more details and photos coming soon... we returned from Baja just last night! Stay tuned to http://forums.BajaNomad.com for the Trip Report.

Happy New Year to you all!

David Kier 1-4-09
====================================================

1966:






========================================================

2009:





(HOLDING THE 1966 PHOTO)



From 'The Baja Book' by Tom Miller:


====================================================

Many, many more photos and details coming soon!



[Edited on 1-14-2009 by David K]

shari - 1-4-2009 at 10:23 AM

that's so cool David...way to go...I love that the cactus in the back is still there although it may not be for long it looks like. What a wonderful baja experience for you.

David K - 1-4-2009 at 10:27 AM

By-the-way, this was 2 days ago: Friday, January 2, 2008

We returned last night, after a night in El Rosario... previous nights at L.A. Bay and Bahia Santa Maria (after BajaLous' turkey fiesta). Stay tuned to the Nomad Trip Reports Forum for all 4 days worth of details and potos!

Diver - 1-4-2009 at 10:32 AM

DK
we heard that you were coming through el rosario and looked for you truck.
I dont know how we missed you !!

I also think I saw the ghost - or some reasonable facsimile of Mr BajaNomad himself. He will be surprised when he reads the back of my card !

Barry A. - 1-4-2009 at 10:32 AM

David----------My heartiest congratulations to you, and crew--------that is really great, my friend. It is fasinating to see how the ocatillo has hardly grown at all, yet the "tree" (a Palo Verde??) on the left side of the pic. has really grown quite a bit. And, as Shari says, the cordon on the skyline has changed it's character quite a bit.

I love "before and after" photos, and you have some good ones here.

Can't wait for the "rest of the story", and your conclusions.

This is really exciting------------WHERE EXACTLY IS IT????

Barry

David K - 1-4-2009 at 10:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by shari
that's so cool David...way to go...I love that the cactus in the back is still there although it may not be for long it looks like. What a wonderful baja experience for you.


Thanks Shari!

It was FANTASTIC!!!

Rates up there with the bighorn sheep encounter at Mision Santa Maria and finding a huge petro site I didn't know existed, east of El Socorro.

This was the best... and was a great way to start the year!

Yes, considering nearly 43 years seperate the photos, the cardon, ocotillos, old man cactus, etc. are very slightly changed! These plants really grow ultra slow... Just imaging how old they all are!

bacquito - 1-4-2009 at 10:41 AM

So interesting, truly an adventure and something that is benefits all

David K - 1-4-2009 at 10:42 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Diver
DK
we heard that you were coming through el rosario and looked for you truck.
I dont know how we missed you !!

I also think I saw the ghost - or some reasonable facsimile of Mr BajaNomad himself. He will be surprised when he reads the back of my card !


We arrived at Baja Cactus Friday night at 7:20pm-ish... The place was totally full... We were refered to the brand new motel on the east end of town, across from Baja's Best Restaurant/ B&B... called the Turista Motel... It was great, and only 300 pesos/ $25 US. It will be detailed in the trip report.

Elizabeth and I had 4 fantastic days in Baja... the best! Baja Lou's party, BajaRob and Connie's hospitality, the road to Gonzaga Bay (killed my 'cheap' HID lights), lost mission found, 5 minute border wait at Tecate Saturday afternoon...:bounce::bounce::bounce:

David K - 1-4-2009 at 10:44 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Barry A.
David----------My heartiest congratulations to you, and crew--------that is really great, my friend. It is fasinating to see how the ocatillo has hardly grown at all, yet the "tree" (a Palo Verde??) on the left side of the pic. has really grown quite a bit. And, as Shari says, the cordon on the skyline has changed it's character quite a bit.

I love "before and after" photos, and you have some good ones here.

Can't wait for the "rest of the story", and your conclusions.

This is really exciting------------WHERE EXACTLY IS IT????

Barry


Coming soon Barry... it is right next to a frequently used road, too... but it looks like nobody has been up there (a steep climb) since 1966!

Paulina - 1-4-2009 at 11:42 AM

Waiting for the details...

David K - 1-4-2009 at 12:01 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Paulina
Waiting for the details...


I am loading photos onto Photobucket from the trip (175)... Takes some time!

We came by to see you and Dern on our way back to Bahia Friday afternoon... alas, you left in the morning... perhaps just after we drove south early, past your driveway.

Here is one more photo that was inspired by Pompano!:


The satellite maps of the site, are below...

[Edited on 1-9-2009 by David K]

BajaGringo - 1-4-2009 at 12:25 PM

David, are you sure that is the Lost Mission site? I noticed that the cactus in the background in your photo looks a little different from the one in the 1966 picture???

:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

Seriously though, a big congratulations David.

GREAT JOB!!!

Jack Swords - 1-4-2009 at 12:52 PM

Excellent David...can't wait for more information. Now we need to lose another one so you can find it!

WOW! Outstanding!

jeans - 1-4-2009 at 02:21 PM

WAY to GO!

You've been talking about that for years!

I know that Choral is smiling!

Neal Johns - 1-4-2009 at 04:00 PM

Good dog, DK!

I'm happy for you.

Now, your next assignment, if you care to take it, about that certain lost grave.....

David K - 1-4-2009 at 04:13 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by jeans
WAY to GO!

You've been talking about that for years!

I know that Choral is smiling!


Thank you jeans! It was fantastic! I could feel Choral's spirit there with us last Friday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To the Nomads who have not seen or heard this before...

Choral Pepper wrote the following in May, 2001 (the year before she passed away) for me to read to my guests at my Viva Baja #2 party http://vivabaja.com/vivabaja2 :

Dear Baja Buffs,

Behind his back, I call David " the new Erle Stanley Gardner." His love for
Baja shares the same dedicated clarity and eagerness to share it as did
Uncle Erle's. I am fortunate enough to have been one of those recipients in
both cases. Erle shared it with his books. David shares it with his Viva
Baja adventures.

I have reached a stage in life in which there is more to look back upon than
forward to. It is not depressing.
What I have to look back upon was so filled with adventure, learning and
beauty that nothing in my limited future could surpass it. There are very
few places in the world that I did not explore during my exciting years as a
nationally syndicated travel columnist after selling Desert Magazine, but
of all the places in the world, Baja stands alone. Not just because it was
more isolated in those days (places like Yap and Zamboanga were isolated,
too), but because there is a spiritual quality about Baja that seeps into
the very soul of those who respond to it. Everyone doesn't., but you who
are here at David's Viva Baja event tonight know exactly what I mean.. We
Baja buffs share a space foreign to superficial types unaware of the
peninsulas unique nature, mysterious history, and tantalizing lore.

During my early days of exploring the desert, I found that the public can be
induced to respect such backcountry areas as Baja -- not by rules and
regimentation, but by education. And the education begins by making its
history exciting and adventurous. When someone goes looking for a lost
treasure, for instance, they are forced to thoroughly research the area.
They aren't just spinning wheels over meaningless, empty land. With
knowledge, comes respect. You all who participate in David's Viva Baja are
doing your part to insure a secure future for Baja. I salute you and would
love to be sharing this evening with you

Sometimes when you are out there trampling through dry, rock-studded
arroyos or watching the moon rise above a cardon forest, send a thought to
me. I'll be sharing it with you in spirit.



Choral Pepper

=============================================

David K - 1-4-2009 at 04:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Neal Johns
Good dog, DK!

I'm happy for you.

Now, your next assignment, if you care to take it, about that certain lost grave.....


You know Neal, Baja Angel and I were discussing that very thing on our way home... !

The Lost Diaz Grave... much closer to home, north of San Felipe (maybe), near Cerro Borrego/ Arroyo Grande... Pole Line Road is just north! STAY TUNED!!!

Sharksbaja - 1-4-2009 at 04:51 PM

Good job David! Can't wait to hear all about it.

LINKS TO MORE PHOTOS HERE:

David K - 1-4-2009 at 05:49 PM

Good job Corky with your eyes scanning the desert of Baja looking for tiny lines in odd places!

My entire 1/09 trip report begins with Part 1, here: http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=36237

More photos at the ancient site begin on Part 3 of my 1/09 trip report... Here is the link to Part 3 showing the dam, palm, wall from the road, below: http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=36243

Part 4 is on top of the mesa.

Part 5 is at Bahia las Animas and a wall on the desert floor.

Coming soon:

Part 6 is at Las Flores

Part 7 is at El Rosario

[Edited on 1-7-2009 by David K]

Sharksbaja - 1-4-2009 at 06:29 PM

David the clues you provided told me where to look. I concentrated on searching the area with a 5 mile radius from the water. They said it was only a few miles from the Bay so I looked at any "mountain" in that vicinity.
I hope you can deduce who built all that. Were their middens on the mesa? Did the wall have a substantial base like the Jesuits were know for?

Could you see where there was past evidence of near-surface water? Also there appears to be a thick growth of vegetation just downstream of the mesa. Did you see that.

There were lines running up along the edge of the arroyo fan that could be walls. Were you able to get over there?

Yes, I've been real cuious too!:lol: Good stuff David. I hope this can clear up some intriguing questions. Are you going back soon?


btw, I found some other misplaced walls in Baja. Curious?

bajabif - 1-4-2009 at 09:00 PM

who said it was lost in the first place? it was right there all along

BajaNomad - 1-4-2009 at 11:09 PM

David - a big congratulations sir. Thanks for the before and after pics - I've enjoyed them along with everyone else. Amazing to think how old those desert plants truly are.

Mango - 1-4-2009 at 11:34 PM

Congratulations David K. The story of this mission has indeed been intriguing over the years and I am glad you were able to find the site.

It might be a good idea to report your find to someone at the INAH or a professor at UABC, etc. Then again.. maybe it wouldn't. It could be good to have someone thoroughly survey/map and document the area.

Either way, right on DK!

Sharksbaja - 1-5-2009 at 12:07 AM

Doug is right. Look at those little plants, they have hardly grown in 40 years. Wow!

David K - 1-5-2009 at 12:28 AM

It really is amazing at how slow the plants grow... That a simple ocotillo is alive perhaps for may human generations. Cardons and boojums may be a thousand years old?

Tonight, while taking a break from the computer, I was comparing the 1966 photo and last Friday's photo... Elizabeth did a good job of being in almost the same spot as Choral, when she took the photo. I can actually see the rock I was standing on... in the 1966 photo! I have a LOT more photos of the site, stay tuned to the Trip Reports forum!

Yes Corky, there were a 'ton' of clam shells and oyster shells up on the mesa, above the wall... I have photos of them... will post soon in the trip reports thread. We did not search the desert beyond the base of the mesa... Only saw part of one wall on the desert floor, to the north of the mesa. Choral did write that the wall went across the valley... ?

Frankly, I was amazed that so much of what Choral said was spot on, no embellishment necessary!

Thank you Doug for the nice words... and other Nomads, too! I am just so very happy to share this 're-discovery' with you all.

I will soon give exact directions to the site... It can be reached by 2WD, high clearance vehicles, no problem (dry weather).

The mesa climb is difficult and perhaps almost dangerous... So, use caution when climbing... I did hurt myself when I went to see the cave, when the lava gave way under my feet and I fell a few feet, landing on my left arm... My blood marked the spot... Just like at the steep grade near Mision Santa Maria from the first time I was there on a quad, and wiped out! The name 'widowmaker' has since been applied to that grade! Someone could easily fall all the way to the desert floor, 100 feet below! The sides are that steep...

The site really seems to be a fort, and maybe a mission would be below, by the dam? Santa Maria Magdalena resembles the first Jesuit colony site at San Bruno, north of Loreto... from what I have read of it.



[Edited on 1-5-2009 by David K]

Barry A. - 1-6-2009 at 11:09 AM

bump

Letter from Choral Pepper's son, 1-5-09

David K - 1-6-2009 at 05:48 PM

I also posted this in the trip report Part 5:

(fyi: Corke, silent e, is what Choral prefered to be called by friends and family)


1-5-09

David, thanks for sharing your find with my family. To think several times so close and then a satellite image helps you to I.D. the location. It's unfortunate the historians lost interest in this site. With infrastructures, the location and forever unknown possibilities-much room is left for speculation and conclusion. A historians dream. But you know what I'm more impressed by are the considerations you and the other contributing Baja nomads offer in the blog.

I don’t portend to be at any level near what you, Elizabeth and the frequent explores of Baja expertise. I can comment that Corke would be proud to have associated with you and be remembered in your find.

As a kid in ’63 I stayed home when Corke went with Uncle Earl, J.R. and the rest of the team to Baja. So much was revealed in their stories/ writings yet it amazes me how much was forgotten. You would have thought with the Bell helicopter, J’R’s “Grasshoppers and Pak-jacs vehicles designed to explorer Baja, and very capable people every site would have been surveyed and charted. This was roughly done and with minimal impact.

Hell, I was in seventh heaven when we went back in following years, we had no doubt Corke's findings would be revisited. “I’m sure it’s on the other side of that saguaro, Oh, I remember that old tire fire next to the road, we’re near,” she would say. More times than not we overshot the site but ended up finding new things to dwell on. Using the same tools of exploration, “feel, stubbornness, a few notes”, 30 some years later Corke made her last trip to Baja with Denis. The results she wrote about.

What I learned from those years is they all recorded the “moment”. The people (past and present), technology, superstition, speculation came together for that moment to reveal parts of Baja past and then to retreat as if it was sacred ground “forgotten”.

What I love is the time line of discovery and rediscovery. You are walking the site some 45 years later. Who was there before you? Were those shells left in the last 30 years?
Was that cave man made? Will your boot soles be around when the next explorer discover the site?
Keep in touch.

Happy new years and thanks,

Trent

[Edited on 1-7-2009 by David K]

Sharksbaja - 1-6-2009 at 06:31 PM

What a nice and romantic letter. David, I'm sure you're proud to be part of the family so to speak. Thanks for sharing it!

David K - 1-7-2009 at 09:50 AM

De nada!

Debra - 1-7-2009 at 11:22 AM

wow! YOU FINALLY FOUND IT! Congrats!! Did you wet your pants, jump for joy or just scream into the hills?!

Funny, a few weeks ago I was on the way to Las Animas and scaned the hills myself, giggling ("Dad it's lost aready, that is why they call it a lost mission" how did Christopher react to your news?) remembering the trip we took, and I swear I thought I saw something man made like the pictures you showed me years ago. Of course I knew it couldn't be the "mission" as it was too close to the road and in plain view.

I'm very,very happy for you and I know Corke was looking down and also jumping for joy!

Graham - 1-7-2009 at 11:34 AM

David,

Congratulations!

Fascinating, thought-provoking stuff. Thanks for documenting it so well, and to Sharksbaja for the great work with the satellite imagery.

Easy to imagine Choral Pepper's spirit, smiling, back there with you.

Wonderful to share your enthusiasm and excitement. Makes me want to get my boots on, load up a burro, and head way south.

Graham

David K - 1-7-2009 at 06:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Debra
wow! YOU FINALLY FOUND IT! Congrats!! Did you wet your pants, jump for joy or just scream into the hills?!

Funny, a few weeks ago I was on the way to Las Animas and scaned the hills myself, giggling ("Dad it's lost aready, that is why they call it a lost mission" how did Christopher react to your news?) remembering the trip we took, and I swear I thought I saw something man made like the pictures you showed me years ago. Of course I knew it couldn't be the "mission" as it was too close to the road and in plain view.

I'm very,very happy for you and I know Corke was looking down and also jumping for joy!


YES... I almost did... I think I cried a tear of joy! I will let Baja Angel tell you my words or how I uttered them when I saw that palm! That was it for me... I knew we had found it! Sarah was very happy, she was thrilled... Chris hasn't heard yet... I will let him know soon.

David K - 1-7-2009 at 06:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Graham
David,

Congratulations!

Fascinating, thought-provoking stuff. Thanks for documenting it so well, and to Sharksbaja for the great work with the satellite imagery.

Easy to imagine Choral Pepper's spirit, smiling, back there with you.

Wonderful to share your enthusiasm and excitement. Makes me want to get my boots on, load up a burro, and head way south.

Graham
What an honor to hear this from you Sr. Mackintosh! Thank you sir!!

Graham - 1-8-2009 at 12:44 AM

David,

De nada. Your painstaking postings and attention to detail are truly humbling.

Thanks for the inspiration and for promoting such fascinating debate and speculation. Choral Pepper would have loved that.

Recalled our get together with her way back when…what a delightful and generous lady.

Graham

David K - 1-8-2009 at 08:46 AM

The time when you and I went there together was fun... Neal and Marian Johns were there, too.

Choral (Corke) invited me back several times to go over the new 'Baja Missions, Mysteries and Myths' book editing... this was after the publisher added new demands on Choral she wasn't willing or able to comply with and gave me the book m/s to do what I wished with.

Every time I am sure we talked about the Santa Maria Magdalena site... she really wanted to go back and see it, we could find it again!

Here is a photo of us taken about 2001.

[Edited on 1-8-2009 by David K]

Choral Pepper-r.JPG - 34kB

The clues and the find... Da Vinci Code style.

David K - 1-8-2009 at 09:47 AM

The entire chapter is posted in the Nomad Historical Interests and Literature forum... Here is the part of Choral's book with what the Erle Stanley Gardner team saw in February, 1966... What I have been looking for, all these years:

===================================================

There it was, a primitive dam among rocks and dead trees with a scraggly date palm standing alone. Usually date palms appear in groves. This one was relatively young, so must have sprouted from seeds dropped by dead ones.
We left our grasshoppers to climb into the ravine and examine remnants of the dam that once held water in a natural reservoir. An ancient wall half-buried in sand angled from the dam to stretch in broken sections across the level valley. Then, from the other end, a similar wall serpentined up the side of a steep mountain. It was easy to miss, as the stones were coated with desert varnish and melded into the rocky terrain. The upper parts of the wall, constructed above a thicker base typical of mission trails, remained in only a few places. The top of the mountain appeared flat, but its sides were steep. From where we stood, we could only guess at a structure on top.


It was a hot day and a climb up the hill uninviting, but somehow I felt we’d discovered something interesting. Subsequent research proved me right about that, as established in my earlier Baja books. Today it is generally accepted that this is the old Jesuit mission of Santa Maria Magdalena, which was never finished, and which had necessitated the Padres Gulfo Camino, later abandoned.
In the first place, the rock-lined wall leading up the steep hill was an enormously ambitious project, much more than Indians native to Baja would have undertaken on their own. Then, the rocks on the walls were heavily coated with desert varnish, all of it deposited on the upper sides. This black coating on rocks called desert varnish occurs in desert regions all over the world, often on the faces of rocky cliffs as well as on rock covered ground. European scientists refer to it as dunkel Riden and believe it is caused when rainwater soaks into the rock and is then brought back to the surface by capillary action of the sun. Here it evaporates, leaving a deposit of the chemicals with which it becomes charged according to the composition of the rock itself. If there is too much moisture, it departs the rock in liquid form and carries the salts with it. If there is too little moisture, salts are not dissolved to form the varnish on top while unexposed sides remain natural. In desert climates like Baja, it can take many centuries to form. In less than several hundred years the tops of all these rocks would not have tanned to the same degree. On the plateau at the top of the mountain, the wall continued around the edge, but in several areas there were large piles of rock, that appeared to have fallen, or been knocked down, from a larger structure, possibly a lookout tower.


We were intrigued by a series of rock rings grouped in a colony at the far end of the plateau, some with adjoining openings as if to designate separate rooms. Early Baja natives connected with the missions often lived in circular pens of stones, sleeping on the bare ground. Eroded clamshells lay among the rings, suggesting the pens had held people, not cattle.


In view of extensive walls in the now arid valley below and the number of huge old trees, many dead, there must have been a live spring dammed there at one time. Walls designed to confine cattle as well as the presence of a date palm clearly indicated missionary direction. But historical as well as physical evidence re-enforced my identification of the site as Santa Maria Magdalena.

====================================================

Here is what Baja Angel and I saw in January, 2009:

1) Primitive dam






2) Scraggly date palm standing alone






3) Reservoir that once held water (photo from mesa)




4) Ancient wall, half-buried in sand




5) Then, from the other end, a similar wall serpentined up the side of a steep mountain. It was easy to miss, as the stones were coated with desert varnish and melded into the rocky terrain.






6) The top of the mountain appeared flat, but its sides were steep.

TOP:


SIDES (notice the slide/ chute, cleared of rocks):



7) On the plateau at the top of the mountain, the wall continued around the edge






8) in several areas there were large piles of rock, that appeared to have fallen, or been knocked down, from a larger structure, possibly a lookout tower.




9) We were intrigued by a series of rock rings grouped in a colony at the far end of the plateau, some with adjoining openings as if to designate separate rooms












10) Eroded clamshells lay among the rings, suggesting the pens had held people, not cattle.





Yup... the clues were right on target... and with Sharksbaja sharp eye in GoogleEarth spotting a wall from space, the mystery as to where the old mission or whatever site was, was solved!



[Edited on 1-9-2009 by David K]

Barry A. - 1-8-2009 at 10:24 AM

BINGO!!!! Excellent post, David.

You are certainly able to cry "EUREKA" on this find, Dr. Holmes.

(and to think I drove right by that place at least 12 times in the last 26 years)

Barry

Site Marked

David K - 1-8-2009 at 05:46 PM

I went over the Google Earth 3-D images of the site and made some changes/ additions:

First, the mesa, looking west, unmarked...




With label marks, looking northwest...




looking west...




looking south...




and looking northeast...


Steve in Oro Valley - 1-8-2009 at 09:08 PM

Great Trip, David!!

Sta Maria Magdalena site?

This site reminds me of the TRINCHERAS sites of Northern Sonora and also near Tucson...
The indigenous peoples were successful for 100s of years in trapping water for agricultural purposes long before the advent of Jesuits...

Tinaja Santa Maria: (nearby)
Also, I noticed that there are two La Unions and two la Polea references on my maps (one near El Arco) and both or one appear to be on the Camino Real...

Do you know what the two La Unions are about?

Thanks


Steve in Oro Valley

David K - 1-9-2009 at 09:01 AM

Hi Steve, I am looking for any input on what the purpose of the parallel walls are going up the side of the mesa (one lone, one short, on the saddle)... Directing sheep to the top of the mesa was one. The 'chute' is real steep, but free of rocks. If not to drag supplies up by rope from the desert floor, then could livestock climb up that? Then at the top of the really steep slope at the end of the chute, you are in the area between the two walls... at the lower end.

Tinaja Santa Maria is a ways south, just off the Golfo Camino Real... La Union is on the Camino Real northwest of Santa Gertrudis. Have you seen this thread I did on the Camino Real... La Union (a ranch) is included: http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=36002

The other La Union, I don't know... I have only seen it on the Baja Almanac.

[Edited on 1-9-2009 by David K]

Steve in Oro Valley - 1-9-2009 at 04:38 PM

Thanks David:

I would suggest that you google - trincheras-

There is a web site belonging to the University of Arizona which has a lot of information about these desert structures and what they may have been used for....

I just got back from a hike (northwest of Tucson) to Cerro Prieto (Los Robles community) and in particular, a low hill called "dictionary hill" which is huge for petroglyphs...

Did you encounter shards, tools or petroglyphs at the mesa near Las Animas?

The late son of Anita Espinosa used to teach in Trincheras, Sonora years ago and he brought Anita many artifacts from the trincheras sites . She showed me some them when I last met with her in El Rosario in 1997.


I would suspect that most of the work done at Las Animas was done without the help of the Jesuits...

Thanks

Steve in Oro Valley

p.s. What about the old road to Rancho La Bocana???

David K - 1-9-2009 at 05:03 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Steve in Oro Valley
Thanks David:

I would suggest that you google - trincheras-

There is a web site belonging to the University of Arizona which has a lot of information about these desert structures and what they may have been used for....

I just got back from a hike (northwest of Tucson) to Cerro Prieto (Los Robles community) and in particular, a low hill called "dictionary hill" which is huge for petroglyphs...

Did you encounter shards, tools or petroglyphs at the mesa near Las Animas?

The late son of Anita Espinosa used to teach in Trincheras, Sonora years ago and he brought Anita many artifacts from the trincheras sites . She showed me some them when I last met with her in El Rosario in 1997.


I would suspect that most of the work done at Las Animas was done without the help of the Jesuits...

Thanks

Steve in Oro Valley

p.s. What about the old road to Rancho La Bocana???


Hi again Steve... I have been to La Bocana (mis-named San Pedro in the Almanac) once and the entire old road (the Gardner '66 route) several times... Please see this thread posted before the discovery. In this other thread is a map pointing to the areas I concentrated on, including two trips to Tinaja Santa Maria: http://forums.bajanomad.com/viewthread.php?tid=35520



In my trip report of last week is a photo of a metate on top of the mesa... no other tools were noticed in our time up there. If there were petros or anything other of interest, I would have photographed it! We were surprised that there were no rock markings at all... Perhaps INAH or others in the years since this site was discovered first have removed them?

I appreciate your input... If not ordered by the Jesuits, why would the natives build those long low walls? The amount of Desert Varnish on them convinced Pepper and the others that the walls were hundreds of years old...

An attempt at establishing a Spanish fort on the mesa and a mission below would have been between 1752 and 1762 in my estimation (after Santa Gertrudis and before San Borja were established).

I am guessing that if it was a Spanish fort and mission start(like San Bruno, near Loreto), that the site was abandoned because the spring dried up or a dryer season didn't bring expected rains to fill that reservoir there. Perhaps the desire to follow the coast around to Sonora by the Jesuits was halted by the king, and they were re-directed to the north to occupy upper California before the Russians or British.... so San Borja was chosen as the next mission.

On the map, the distance from Santa Gertrudis north to Las Animas is very similar to the distance north to San Borja!

This is all great stuff... let's keep the ideas flowing!

[Edited on 1-10-2009 by David K]

Sharksbaja - 1-10-2009 at 03:50 PM

I'm curious David. Both you and Jack Swords have hinted heavily that INAH has more than likely documented this place. Is that info off-limits to researchers and explorers like yourselves?
Is there something you do know that would indicate that the site has indeed been surveyed and otherwise documented by that authority?
It seems you dismiss this site as important because INAH may have documented it..
If so how would one go about access that pertinent and vital archival information and more importantly, why have you not investigated that angle for quantifying your pursuit and search for the ruins? Just curious.

How many antiquities of Spanish origin have turned up at any of the sites that have been catalogued, any idea?

David K - 1-10-2009 at 04:42 PM

Sharks, I am just an avid Baja enthusiast who loves the history of California... wich begins in Baja, the first California. Anything to do with old California history interests me, as well as many others.

I am willing to drive a hundred rough dirt miles, sleep on a rock hard bed (Costa del Sol Room 8), and not have a job waiting for me when I return... JUST to see if what you spotted on Google Earth could be the site I have wanted to visit since 1973 when I first read about it, and made several trips into the region over the past 8 years. It was, I was most thrilled, and I want to share my excitement... However, to put this into some perspective:

It is some rock walls, earth dams, a dead looking palm tree, and some clam shells inside of rock circles on top of a lava mesa...

THAT is what brought me there, to see it... confirm it was what the Gardner Party saw in 1966... and that was about it.

Choral Pepper and maybe others believed it was an abandoned mission project called Santa Maria Magdalena. From what I saw, there were a combination of Spanish like efforts (the dam, canal, walls) at an excellent look-out spot, along with obvious Indian-like rock 'sleeping' circles, clam and oyster shells, and a metate (grinding stone).

We went there, and I shared the photos with all of you, my fellow Baja enthusiasts... There is nothing more to it than that...

As far as INAH goes, I tried to work with them in 2005 with an effort to preserve Mision Santa Maria... I got all sorts of positive feedback and enthusiasm at what we had volunteered to do (stop the doorway erosion) until the day before we left when I got a complete reversal of support and orders to not do anything... and on top of that to provide transportation to and from the site the same day for an INAH person who was passing by. Then, they promissed to begin restoration a over year ago and all they did was go in and take photos and leave a marker with an older date on it.

INAH allows existing, known missions and visitas to vanish (Santo Tomas both sites, Santa Catalina, San Juan de Dios, Santa Maria... and little remains of El Rosario's 2 adobe sites, San Miguel, San Fernando...

These rock walls are not higher on a priority rating, than the actual, established missions... and have not changed in 43 years, unlike the adobe missions.

Jack Swords has approval from INAH to photograph any historic sites... as a way to preserve them, since INAH isn't or can't. Already there are missions Jack, Kevin or I has photographed that have fallen (La Presntacion, El Novillo, Ligüí)

Again, the site is in plain view and well described... no reason to think that Baja Angel and I are the first people there since 1966... and if we were, than it is high time others can enjoy the experience of walking around an old Spanish fort or an Indian rancheria... what ever the site was.

Sharksbaja - 1-11-2009 at 01:11 AM

Ok then, thanks for that. Seriously, I think there is more to the story but I can handle it, not knowing who the heck built it.:lol:

It is a shame heritage and history is so lightly considered in Baja. Kudos to you and Jack for preserving history through your own efforts.

NEW DETAILS!

David K - 1-12-2009 at 11:23 AM

I posted this 'discovery' on other Baja sites, as well... Hoping for some answers! Thanks to a 'Fulano' on the Baja Quest forum (bajaforums.com)....

Corky, you will be happy to hear that the site was studied by archaeologists in 1994, per some papers I saw written by Eric W. Ritter for the Pacific Coast Archaelogical Society. http://www.pcas.org/Vol34N3/343Rittr.pdf and http://www.pcas.org/documents/Observationsa.pdf

The site is known as Cerro de las Calaveras (Hill of the Skulls)

The 'sleeping circles' are burial sites... human bones were in them.

The site pre dates the Jesuits by a 1,000-6,000 years... (I did a quick look at the pages).

I need to go to an appointment right now... I found no explanation for the walls, dam, palm, etc., however. Perhaps the Jesuits were there much later?

>>> Update: This is NOT the site visited by Dr. Ritter!

[Edited on 1-14-2009 by David K]

Sharksbaja - 1-12-2009 at 12:11 PM

Wow! How did this peson come to know about the hill? I'm curious as to why he/shecome forward as per your search earlier.
Those are some intriguing artifacts and evidence found. Very cool indeed. I especially love the name of that hill. Did they find skulls there? I'll have to read the literature.
Glad to hear it's documented. Funny how others knew all along.:rolleyes:

I guess we should have Googled it first!:lol:
Here is some more data from Ritter et al:

http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/bitstream/1892/8497/1/b18457976.pdf



[Edited on 1-12-2009 by Sharksbaja]

Barry A. - 1-12-2009 at 01:48 PM

This is really funny----------I have known Dr. Ritter well for some 35 years, and he lives only a few blocks from me here in Redding, CA.

I guess I need to go over and talk to him. :light:

Barry

BajaGringo - 1-12-2009 at 01:51 PM

And then report back!!!

Barry A. - 1-12-2009 at 01:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by BajaGringo
And then report back!!!


------Oh my Gawd, responsibility for sure. ;D

Sharksbaja - 1-12-2009 at 04:19 PM

Perhaps you can convince him to join in Nomads, Barry. That would be the icing on Davids' cake. Glad to see the mystery solved. Those are freakin' old walls!!!:wow::wow::wow:

David K - 1-12-2009 at 04:49 PM

Barry, I got your email before reading this thread, this afternoon... Please see if Dr. Ritter would like to answer those questions... The rock rings on top of the mesa are interesting, but the purpose and builders of the walls leading up to the mesa as well as the dam and walls below on the desert floor is even more interesting to me, and I don't see (yet) any explanation for them. I would like to read Ritter's article on Las Animas in P.C.A.S's Quarterly Vol. 30 (Winter, 1994) as it is not available on line, that I have been able to see so far.

Thank you so much!!!

>>> Update, the mesa of my photos was not one studied by Dr. Ritter or listed in the PCAS Vol. 30.

[Edited on 1-16-2009 by David K]

BajaGringo - 1-12-2009 at 05:01 PM

Barry - ask him if they left what they found in place or was it removed? if so are they on display anywhere???

wilderone - 1-12-2009 at 05:54 PM

"The 'sleeping circles' are burial sites... human bones were in them"

David, I don't think that's what the article said: "The site types include ... hundreds of widely scattered rock enclosures. These rock rings or rock enclosures occur on the fan, hills and shorelines, sometimes in clusters of up to 24. They are variable in size and position, often found with shells and artifacts. They occur at remote locations with expansive vistas. Here they sure have no other cultural association. ... Burial pattern differentiation and shamaic involvement, as perhaps in rock art production and construction of possible ritual-related features such as cleared pathways and rock enclosures lacking residential debris are uncertain possibilities."

IMHO, there are too many of these rock circles found everywhere to be burial sites. I found them side by side at El Volcan where there was evidence of habitation - they wouldn't bury their dead where they're living day to day. If they're 6000 years old, the apparent condition of them has possibly changed from their original purpose and evidence found when studies were done can be misinterpreted. If they were once buried and dug up, I think there would be evidence of that; and I believe they burned their dead or sick people just wandered off to die alone somewhere.
??????????
I know that at some Anasazi sites bones laying on the ground were found (2000 years later) after an apparent battle, and those were the bones of the murdered. I don't know why their remaining tribesmen didn't bury their remains regardless.

The walls could possibly be a boundary of sorts. I know that some of the tribes were not peaceful and could be a way to claim territory. Pictographs are full of "boundary" type messages indicating that other boundary proclamations of another sort is possible. Have you ever seen the very similar rock wall just north of Bishop CA - both sides of Hwy. 395 known to be of indigenous origin - very much like the Animas rock wall in construction.

David K - 1-12-2009 at 06:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by wilderone
"The 'sleeping circles' are burial sites... human bones were in them"

David, I don't think that's what the article said: "The site types include ... hundreds of widely scattered rock enclosures. These rock rings or rock enclosures occur on the fan, hills and shorelines, sometimes in clusters of up to 24. They are variable in size and position, often found with shells and artifacts. They occur at remote locations with expansive vistas. Here they sure have no other cultural association. ... Burial pattern differentiation and shamaic involvement, as perhaps in rock art production and construction of possible ritual-related features such as cleared pathways and rock enclosures lacking residential debris are uncertain possibilities."

IMHO, there are too many of these rock circles found everywhere to be burial sites. I found them side by side at El Volcan where there was evidence of habitation - they wouldn't bury their dead where they're living day to day. If they're 6000 years old, the apparent condition of them has possibly changed from their original purpose and evidence found when studies were done can be misinterpreted. If they were once buried and dug up, I think there would be evidence of that; and I believe they burned their dead or sick people just wandered off to die alone somewhere.
??????????
I know that at some Anasazi sites bones laying on the ground were found (2000 years later) after an apparent battle, and those were the bones of the murdered. I don't know why their remaining tribesmen didn't bury their remains regardless.

The walls could possibly be a boundary of sorts. I know that some of the tribes were not peaceful and could be a way to claim territory. Pictographs are full of "boundary" type messages indicating that other boundary proclamations of another sort is possible. Have you ever seen the very similar rock wall just north of Bishop CA - both sides of Hwy. 395 known to be of indigenous origin - very much like the Animas rock wall in construction.


I love all the input possible... Cindi, did you look at illustrations #20 & 22 at http://www.pcas.org/Vol34N3/343Rittr.pdf ?

Those are human bones inside the rock circles... on Cerro de las Calaveras...

Just seeking the truth (it is out there)!

>>> Update: human bones were not in the rock circles, but in other shallow sites... and not at all at the mesa of my photos.

[Edited on 1-16-2009 by David K]

David K - 1-12-2009 at 06:25 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Wow! How did this peson come to know about the hill? I'm curious as to why he/shecome forward as per your search earlier.
Those are some intriguing artifacts and evidence found. Very cool indeed. I especially love the name of that hill. Did they find skulls there? I'll have to read the literature.
Glad to hear it's documented. Funny how others knew all along.:rolleyes:

I guess we should have Googled it first!:lol:
Here is some more data from Ritter et al:

http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/bitstream/1892/8497/1/b18457976.pdf



[Edited on 1-12-2009 by Sharksbaja]


Corky, as I have been saying... this hill is no secret... it's right there by the bay with a popular road going around both sides of it. The walls and circles were photographed and published in 1966... Lot's of time for research to examine it all. I just wanted to find THAT place that was photographed by Choral.

Thanks to your sharp eye on Google Earth, I have been there, and it is a highly intersting place. I am not at all surprised that archaeologists have already documented the site. That is sort of a relief now for those who think I opened pandora's box and Nomads will descend on the hill like locusts and leave trash and paint graffiti!

I have a better opinion of you Nomads... You love Baja like I do and want the best for Baja and wish new Baja enthusiasts a good time and to appreciate the peninsula, too!

Sharksbaja - 1-12-2009 at 06:46 PM

Well to be on the safe side let's assume that Dr Ritter researched the hill and found evidence of possible habitation. Inasmuch tools and the middens associated with them confirm this. Now are you willing to say that this place may hold more significant evidence than what was found during Dr Ritters study?
Don't be quick to dispell the notion. It is a large area there that was used heretofore for purposes still unknown. There were people there for a considerable amount of time evidenced by the extensive rock work.

My feeling is that the hill is a sacred site used for burial rituals. The walls may have been built to fend off or prohibit evil spirits from entering the sacred site.
The circles may have been built to confuse the spirits or (peoples??) from locating the buried dead. Maybe that's why if you dig in the correct circle you might find more than dirt and rocks. Hmmmmm...

I guess this place IS important, no?

[Edited on 1-13-2009 by Sharksbaja]

Sharksbaja - 1-12-2009 at 06:50 PM

David I don't get what you are saying. Yes they looked around in 1966. Please explain how you knew this place had been documented by researchers after that, thanks.

Barry A. - 1-12-2009 at 09:38 PM

I talked to Dr. Ritter a few mins. ago-----------the site that David investigated over New Years is NOT the same site that has the graves, etc..

Dr. Ritter is familiar with the site that David explored, but has never actually done any "work" there, other than a cursory look at it. He has always wanted to do archaeological work there, but just has not had the time. As an archaeologist, he is of course concerned that the site is now "known" to the public, and stresses that it really should not be disturbed before a thorough examination is made by qualified experts. He is not aware of any Spanish sites in this area, but who knows???

He was not familiar with the BAJA NOMADS, but is now, and will be logging in tonight, if he has time, or will at least take a look at David's postings, etc..

He wants to talk to David, and I have given David the pertinant info to facillitate that, or will in a few mins. via e-mail.

He also mentioned that there is a Spanish trail that goes over the mountains from San Borja to BOLA, crossing the mountains in the vacinity of the historical mines s. of BOLA----------(???)

That is about all I know for now.

Barry

David K - 1-12-2009 at 10:08 PM

Then where in relation to the bay, or Choral's 'mission' site is the Cerro de las Calaveras?

'Fulano' on BajaForums.com seemed to have already some knowledge of the Ritter report and it was he who said the siite in my photos WAS the Cerro de las Candeleras...

How does Dr. Ritter know the site hasn't been examined?

If it wasn't for my posts about it... I wouldn't have gotten the link to Ritter's papers (some of them, anyway) and you wouldn't have contacted him... It is a chicken or the egg sort of question, perhaps? I went someplace I was looking for, took photos and posted the photos, just like I do with all my Baja trips... and we all can enjoy new places to visit or just see online without touching anything! :light:

I will call Dr. Ritter tomorrow, Barry... Thanks for the contact info. Please see my email, as well.

The Truth is Out There!




[Edited on 1-13-2009 by David K]

Sharksbaja - 1-12-2009 at 10:41 PM

(sigh) What can I say.

Barry A. - 1-12-2009 at 11:36 PM

This is sensitive stuff---------------as Sharks says.

Dr. Ritter can tell you where the "investigated" aboriginal site (s) is/are (his decision), but that is not for me to post here, I am thinking. (contrary to my former arguments)

Believe me, Dr. Ritter does not have all the answers (nobody does), so there is a lot more investigative work to do in the area of Bahia de las Animas. Understand that Dr. Ritter is probably more interested in the Aboriginal history than the Spanish history, and that may cause some confusion, but he does have interest in both aspects, and is considered an expert in Baja archaeological matters, as far as they are known. There is a ton of work still to be done, apparently, but now I am saying more than I really know.

At the risk of sounding dramatic, the plot thickens--------------stay tuned.

Barry

Sharksbaja - 1-13-2009 at 12:08 AM

Thanks a bunch Barry for taking the time and giving a damn. It sure is a small world. I suppose we could have tracked him fdown but you being a friend of his really gave this subject a kickstart.

We sometimes (not me:lol:) jump to conclusions hastily. I was suprised to see David's "it's just a wall" stance. Obviously that is not the case.

David, Dr Ritter is an authority. You already commented as to the poor archaeological interests in Baja by local authorities. When you discuss this with him please ask him if he's aware of other studies of "Cerro Gardner".



[Edited on 1-13-2009 by Sharksbaja]

David K - 1-13-2009 at 10:16 AM

I have sent Dr. Ritter an email and invited him to write back or call me... I will let you guys know.

Sharks, the "it's just a wall" comment is my way of expressing the same attitude or lack of interest the Mexican authorities (INAH) shows. Perhaps it is totally a lack of funding and that with so much in mainland Mexico, Baja is just not high on the list? It also may be the feeling of many of the tourists that go to Baja for fishing, vacation, or to buy property. It is just not interesting to them.

It may be just a wall or piles of rocks and earth... but to us, it shows where a lot of people did a lot of work in the desert... we are interested in knowing why... It had to be important!

synch - 1-13-2009 at 02:38 PM

DK,

Wow, you've done Choral proud! Congratulations.

Did you need 4WD to get there?

Anyway to see a map of it for us "arm chair participants" or are you keeping it quiet?
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&...



BOY, do things grow slowly in the desert. Heck, I knew that already but your dramatic photos show that 43 years hasn't changed much - Very cool stuff.


Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Quote:
Originally posted by Paulina
Waiting for the details...


I am loading photos onto Photobucket from the trip (175)... Takes some time!

We came by to see you and Dern on our way back to Bahia Friday afternoon... alas, you left in the morning... perhaps just after we drove south early, past your driveway.

Here is one more photo that was inspired by Pompano!:


The satellite maps of the site, are below...

[Edited on 1-9-2009 by David K]


[Edited on 1-13-2009 by synch]

[Edited on 1-13-2009 by synch]

Barry A. - 1-13-2009 at 02:44 PM

Synch--------if the Animas Fish camp is not occupied, or the little rancho abandoned, then you could get in trouble with a 2-wheel drive. You are about 40 miles away from BOLA by road, and the side road into Animas is normally a "track", and it can be sandy/deep silt/very muddy. I have pulled several 2-wheel drive trucks out of the sand on that road over the years-----on the other hand the road is often pretty good, and you might have no problems at all. It just depends on the traffic, humidity, and when the last rain was.

You do not want to get stuck out there, in my opinion-------no water anywhere and a longggggg walk to safety.

Barry

David K - 1-13-2009 at 03:47 PM

Hi Synch,

Thank you... I know that Choral had a big happy smile and high fives in heaven when I saw that palm tree and we climbed up that mountainside to see the walls!

As for the road... that day, it was all very fine... 2WD only.

When you reach the fork, the left branch is the more used 'dry' route... However, the right branch is the one that goes right past the dam, the palm, the climb point and the desert floor wall... When it leaves the side of the mesa and before it rejoins the left branch 2.0 miles from the beach past the fish camp, there is an area that looks like lunar high tides will flood, and an area of silt (Baja dust).... both very brief. If wet, turn around and detour back 2.2 miles to the original fork, if you want to go to the beach after exploring. You can see the wall only from the left branch...

Dr. Eric W. Ritter Archaeologist

David K - 1-13-2009 at 10:38 PM

Hello All,

I just spent quite a while on the phone with Dr. Ritter... He has looked at the photos here on Nomad.

I will give you some of the key points we dicussed:

His Cerro de las Calaveras is NOT the hill/ mesa of my photos and Choral Pepper's.

Burial was not done in rock circles such as those in my photos, but in caves or shallows.

His 'Cerro' is near the fish camp, on the bay. Carbon dating puts some of the activity there at approx. 600 years ago.

The walls in my photos are a mystery to him. Possible sheep herding application... to direct them up or down the mountain?

The reservoir/ dam and earth covered walls on the desert floor do seem to be more than what the native Indians would do, ie. Spanish... But, he is uncertain.

The palm tree is an indication of water... Is it a date palm or a native fan palm? Can it be determined from the trunk?

As far as he knows, no archaeological work has been done on the mesa or around it... I asked how he would know and he said because he has read every published work done since 1969. If a team researched it, it wasn't published.

Dr. Ritter said it IS an interesting site!

We talked further about other Baja projects, INAH, etc. We even had a dialog about a Gonzaga area site. A very nice person and I am happy that Barry A. was able to make the connection for us!

He said he is going to ask W. Michael Mathes (Baja mission historian) to examine my photos...

Very exciting!

Sharksbaja - 1-13-2009 at 10:57 PM

and....

David K - 1-13-2009 at 10:59 PM

... and I will let you know when I find out more, if there is more!

STAY TUNED!

avid - 1-13-2009 at 11:21 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K

The walls in my photos are a mystery to him. Possible sheep herding application... to direct them up or down the mountain?


In livestock terms it would be called a drift fence. Drift fences are non-contiguous fences built to prevent livestock from going in directions they are not supposed to. I would imagine they were grazing the flats from this location to the bay. Each evening they were bedded down on the top. Sheepherder's love high spots. Even today herders in the West deal with predators on a daily basis. Imagine what it would have been like in Baja back then. The rock circles could have been pens were ewes giving birth were kept for a couple of days until the lambs could move with the flock.

Flocks of sheep are one of the first signs of settlement. Because they are controlled by a herder and dogs there is almost no need for any infrastructure to support the operation. As I mentioned before, this could have been a beta-test for the proposed Mission. Send a couple of herders and a flock of sheep up and see if they could survive. The other thing herders do is learn a lot about an area. They have scads of time on their hand. They have to move the sheep around to keep them fed. In the meantime they can do all kinds of exploring and rockwork.

David K - 1-14-2009 at 09:01 AM

Thank you avid... a very good possibility and explanation. I appreciate your input here!

It is possible this was a dual site, as well... ie. A native camp (the sleeping circles all contained clams, oyster, scallop shells) on top. A livestock center (water reservoir, drift fences, mesa for the night away from coyotes. Or, something else?

Sharksbaja - 1-14-2009 at 01:25 PM

Ok, I'm really confused now. The rings are dated 1000-6000 years old. Did they have sheep in Baja at that time or are you inferring the rings came first then the walls were built during Spanish times?

David K - 1-14-2009 at 03:42 PM

Rings may be very old... a lot older than the walls...

There were different groups at the mesa site, perhaps?

1) Ancient/ Pre-historic native Indians (rock rings, shells, metate)

2) Spanish soldiers or advance team to establish the next mission north or avid's idea of sheep hearders (Basque?) brought in to see if the site works for them (rock walls, reservoir dam, canal)

3) Mexican ranchers of the late 1800's or early 1900's (Arce or Villavicencio family) who tried to raise sheep there.

The desert varnish is heavy on the wall rocks... that does take hundreds of years per some reports I read...

Maybe there was a good spring at the base of that mesa... Indians used it 600 years ago then came the Jesuits 260 years ago and built the dams and earth walls below the mesa... and planted date palms... the seedling of one survived to what was seen in 1966 and today. Dr. Ritter said a similar palm was by the fish camp's water source, years ago.

The spring dried up, so the padres went up to Adac (San Borja) instead?

If you look at a map, Las Animas and San Borja are about the same distance from Santa Gertrudis!

avid - 1-14-2009 at 06:31 PM

Good campsites are good campsites whether you are a Native American or a sheepherder. I was looking around for Basque sheepherder and rock wall references and ran across this about rock blinds built by the Paiutes to hunt Bighorns.

Paiute Bighorn hunting

Quote:

All through the region, Paiute stone hunting blinds are concealed in the boulders on both sides of any saddle through which the Bighorn sheep might pass.



Furthur looking turned up a reference in Anza-Borrego Park about stone circles as bases for brush wickiups.

Stone Circles in Anza-Borrego (Do a page search on Stone)

Quote:

A half-dozen aboriginal stone circles crown a knoll at the confluence of two arroyos.
The rings, about seven feet in diameter, probably served to anchor brush huts.


The idea of herding Bighorn sheep and domestic sheep are not inconsistent with each other. It could be that a herder found the walls used by the natives to hunt bighorns and thought it would be a good place to build a couple of reservoirs and use the work already in place. The plains Indians built corrals in the vertical sided draws of Eastern Montana. They would run buffalo up the draw and then a quick wall was throw in place behind them. Then they would have showered them with stone weapons. Of course, everyone knows about the buffalo jumps.

If you were a Spanish Missionary and you wanted good herders you would have definitely called for the Basques.

[Edited on 1-15-2009 by avid]

Sharksbaja - 1-14-2009 at 10:17 PM

Good sleuthing avid. It would be of interest to note that the remains of the bones that were subjected to isotope testing revealed their diet(s).

It seems fairly conclusive that mammals made up a very small percentage of their diet. I did not see bighorns listed as part of their diet but surely is quite plausible that they somehow managed to trap and kill them.

We need some experts to go find out.

I have seen those bighorns in Alaska literally leap from precipice to precipice with little effort. Those walls sure are low for containing those beasts.

They really are oddly constructed and placed.

David, you are probably correct about the use of the area by different cultures, tribes and peoples. The fact that water was available so close to the sea enabled the inhabitants to thrive. Perhaps the place was well established for eons.:wow:

Taco de Baja - 1-15-2009 at 09:15 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Hello All,

I just spent quite a while on the phone with Dr. Ritter... He has looked at the photos here on Nomad.

I will give you some of the key points we dicussed:


The palm tree is an indication of water... Is it a date palm or a native fan palm? Can it be determined from the trunk?



First, congratulations on findinding this interesting site!

Second, that IS a date palm Phoenix dactylifera, not a native fan palm Washintonia spp. the trunk is quite distinct. They do like water, but can be planted by birds, coyotes, or vaqueros spitting out seeds. They don't necessarily indicate long term "European habitation". Plus, with dates you need a single male tree and lots of female trees to have a "date orchard". You will not get any (or very many, depending on how the wind blows) dates with a single isolated tree.

David K - 1-15-2009 at 10:10 AM

Wonderful news Taco de Baja!!!

That does make the mission connection more realistic... Since fan palms are all over Baja in the canyons, but date palms were introduced by the Jesuits in the mid 1700's. That palm has been there for maybe 75-100 years...? Sprouted from a date from the first ones, 260 years ago? Too bad there isn't a photo of it in 1966 to see the difference in 43 years.

Taco de Baja - 1-15-2009 at 10:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Wonderful news Taco de Baja!!!

That does make the mission connection more realistic...


Not really, David. I have seen dates growing in very remote areas. Probably "planted" by birds, coyotes, vaqueros, or Nomads..:). The fact that there are no European artifacts at the site: glazed ceramics, roof tiles, floor tiles, buttons, glass, coins, etc (At least, none noted in the PCAS article on the site I sent you) suggest to me it is primarily a Native American site. The walls could have been built by vaqueros, but since there is no European debris, I can't see any European habitation component.

There really should be something. For example, when I visited the San Pedro Martir Mission site with Jack Swards, Pappy, Mexitron, and others there was quite a bit of European debris in the area from the mission era.

David K - 1-15-2009 at 11:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Taco de Baja
Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Wonderful news Taco de Baja!!!

That does make the mission connection more realistic...


Not really, David. I have seen dates growing in very remote areas. Probably "planted" by birds, coyotes, vaqueros, or Nomads..:). The fact that there are no European artifacts at the site: glazed ceramics, roof tiles, floor tiles, buttons, glass, coins, etc (At least, none noted in the PCAS article on the site I sent you) suggest to me it is primarily a Native American site. The walls could have been built by vaqueros, but since there is no European debris, I can't see any European habitation component.

There really should be something. For example, when I visited the San Pedro Martir Mission site with Jack Swards, Pappy, Mexitron, and others there was quite a bit of European debris in the area from the mission era.


I confirmed with Dr. Ritter by phone that the hill was NOT checked by him... it is not any of the sites listed in his papers.
There may be buttons in the dirt? The most interesting thing indicating European activity to me is the dam/ reservoir. Dr. Ritter said that is not typical of what natives have done in Baja...

Elizabeth and I didn't do any digging, just observation and photography. The date palm originated from the Jesuits is what I meant... Sure, it could have been a bird dropping after flying there from San Ignacio... but I like to think in more romantic terms!

Thank you for your input here!

(edited by suggestion of T de B)

[Edited on 1-15-2009 by David K]

Barry A. - 1-15-2009 at 12:10 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Taco de Baja
Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Wonderful news Taco de Baja!!!

That does make the mission connection more realistic...


Not really, David. I have seen dates growing in very remote areas. Probably "planted" by birds, coyotes, vaqueros, or Nomads..:). The fact that there are no European artifacts at the site: glazed ceramics, roof tiles, floor tiles, buttons, glass, coins, etc (At least, none noted in the PCAS article on the site I sent you) suggest to me it is primarily a Native American site. The walls could have been built by vaqueros, but since there is no European debris, I can't see any European habitation component.

There really should be something. For example, when I visited the San Pedro Martir Mission site with Jack Swards, Pappy, Mexitron, and others there was quite a bit of European debris in the area from the mission era.


I am not saying there aren't any, but as I remember I have NEVER seen a date palm growing in ANY of the canyons of Baja Norte, and I have been in quite a few canyons over the many years. I tend to agree with David (??) that this date palm was "planted" by a person, and probably not an aboriginal type. Could have been a vaquero, or herder guy, tho, in the relatively recent past. Still, those walls covered by desert varnish-------------THAT is what intrigues me.

Barry

Sharksbaja - 1-15-2009 at 01:56 PM

The palm really just indicates a year round water source. I can imagine that the area may have been pretty lush(for a desert fan) for god knows how long so many years ago..

Gardner noted thick growth there that indicated the spring was still viable not long ago by Baja standards. Who knows what it looked like in it's day.

The evidence dug up nearby does not point to any type of agricultural persuits. I would imagine that if that were to be true, then artifacts(seeds, etc.) would have been found en masse in inhabited places.
Since this place has yet to be proven to be researched we should wait till more concrete evidence can sum up the purpose, function and timeline.

The clues are surely there.

Barry A. - 1-15-2009 at 03:33 PM

My fear, Sharks, is that NOTHING will be done as far as actual 'research' there, since that is the norm in Baja by the "powers that be", for whatever reason. People like Dr. Ritter are the one's that really DO get things done, on a volunteer basis, out of love for the subject and the expertise to accomplish it. But he only has so much time to volunteer.

I believe that David K. also makes a great contribution, in a different way, but still just as significant as Dr. Ritter's, and actually probably effects more people.

Hopefully David's "re-discovery", and his bringing attention to it, will spur some professional Archaeological activity there in the very near future (but I doubt it). In the mean time, many NOMADS are gaining a lot of interesting info, and that is good, IMO.

I know that I sure want to visit the site, and speculate about what happened there------all very exciting!!

Barry

wilderone - 1-15-2009 at 04:42 PM

"My fear, Sharks, is that NOTHING will be done as far as actual 'research' there, since that is the norm in Baja by the "powers that be", for whatever reason."

My fear is that INAH and other expeditions will arrive and, as per their modus operendi, will dig and disturb and remove every single thing they find and put it in a box never to see the light of day again. Much better that such sites are left intact, by visitors and all, so that the site can be appreciated by all. I doubt that the site contains anything that hasn't been seen elsewhere and all conclusions can be drawn therefrom without digging and disturbing the site any further. E.g., the mystery of the sleeping cirlces, once known, will apply to them all.
As explained by Dr. Mathes, Baja's archaeology has not been at the forefront of INAH's and others' attention because there are other sites worldwide that yield much richer results - both in tangible treasures (gold, sculpture, gems, written language) and more relatively exciting knowledge, and given the choice by the limited number of archaeologists, they have overlooked Baja CA's scattered and humble remains in order to be a part of and make a name for themselves elsewhere.
I have seen INAH at work in Yucatan doing wonderful work at Mayan sites - there is still much to excavate and recreate - it's a painstaking process.
I would like to know about these sites, but so much that comes even from experienced archaeologists and ethnologists who only study one small site only conclude uncertainties and "possibilities" from their work. Grant money only buys so much.
I do think though, that with some practiced documentation by amateurs sent to individuals who care to study them (like Dr. Mathes or Ritter), some advances can be made without field work - especially since there are so many small, scattered sites in Baja.
This board should have a place where photos of sites can be posted in one place - maybe some similarities, conclusions, etc can eventually be drawn from them.

David K - 1-15-2009 at 05:15 PM

I posted first in this forum (Baja News) as it was in a way big news to us who want to hear of these lost or forgotten sites being found.

Most of the photos went in the Baja Trip Reports forum as part of my multi part trip report.

The final place I have not really added much to, but would fulfill Wilderone's idea is to put all the photos I took there in the Historic Interests and Literature forum. What I stated there, before the trip and maybe what clued Sharksbaja into my quest was the Choral Pepper unpublished chapter on Santa Maria Magdalena from her m/s that she gave me.

Without all of us sharing details then the truth remains buried or forgotten... It is all of us who work together that makes Baja that much richer!

David K - 1-16-2009 at 04:25 PM

New web page URL for the site: http://vivabaja.com/109 thanks to my web host! It is much easier and shorter than my 'community-2' page builder site!

Mexitron - 1-17-2009 at 08:26 AM

The subject of sheep comes up quite a bit, as they or cows seem to be the only animals able to be corraled by a low rock wall. Did the mission folks have sheep which could survive the heat in that area? And what kind of grazing is there for them? I know goats will eat anything but sheep seem to be in more verdant, and cooler, climes. I'm just guessing since I don't know a lot about livestock but maybe someone can enlighten the situation.

Sharksbaja - 1-17-2009 at 02:40 PM

Looking at the area it appears that at one time water was available for quite a period. That would mean food for animals as well.

The problem with that scenario is, where do you draw the line between habitation by those that built the rings and those that built the wall if in fact the wall was built only hundreds of years ago not thousands.

Domesticated sheep were brought to the New World as early as 1494. Cortes had sheep in Mexico during the 1500s and it's possible I suppose that the introduction of sheep could have occured then.

We'll have to research that. Sheep either domestic or Bighorn we're not mentioned in the diets at the Animas sites. I wonder if the isotope samples that indicate mammals could have overlooked sheep as a possible contributing isotope factor . Mainly because wild sheep were around 1000 years ago.

Evidence points to an arid climate 1000-6000 years ago. It seems not to much has changed in Baja over the millennia. Cactus fruit like pitaya and agave and seeds were main staples in the ancients diet.

So were shellfish and mammals. Dr. Ritters pdf files are copy protected unfortunately so I can't cut and paste from it but one would conclude that the area of BOLA and Animas have similar and connected historical value.

You can conclude a lot from his papers. I would like to ask him if they have identified Bighorn or domestic sheep (or cattle) remains at any site that was preoccupied 1000-6000 years ago.

That might add weight to the notion that the walls were indeed built to contain or direct sheep (or cattle).

David K - 1-17-2009 at 03:11 PM

Dr. Ritter and I have just had some email exchanges about the next site in Baja he is going to study, as I have been there, and am assisting him on it as much as I can/ he needs. (no, I won't tell you where, lol)

Corky, I will be happy to forward your question to him the next time!

Sharksbaja - 1-17-2009 at 04:22 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
(no, I won't tell you where, lol)


What, a double standard? (No way, not you!):lol:


Quote:


Corky, I will be happy to forward your question to him the next time!.


That would be kind of you. I guess he decided against signing on here. Too bad.,I don't really want to go thru you and get something back paraphrased. ;D

David K - 1-17-2009 at 05:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Sharksbaja
Quote:
Originally posted by David K
(no, I won't tell you where, lol)


What, a double standard? (No way, not you!):lol:


Quote:


Corky, I will be happy to forward your question to him the next time!.


That would be kind of you. I guess he decided against signing on here. Too bad.,I don't really want to go thru you and get something back paraphrased. ;D


Well, can you blame him? Who would want to join a place where anyone who has different ideas than you gets jumped on and mis-quoted in a feeding frenzie of loonies!

Seriously, he read the posts here regarding the site discovery we made... if he continues to read or decides to post himself, I don't know.

As for your question for him, I am not sure what you are saying? Yes, 'it would be kind of me' (ie. do it)? OR: No, you 'don't really want to go through me to ask him'?

As always, I am happy to help anyone in the pursuit of Baja knowledge, adventure or exploration!

avid - 1-17-2009 at 06:23 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Mexitron
The subject of sheep comes up quite a bit, as they or cows seem to be the only animals able to be corraled by a low rock wall. Did the mission folks have sheep which could survive the heat in that area? And what kind of grazing is there for them? I know goats will eat anything but sheep seem to be in more verdant, and cooler, climes. I'm just guessing since I don't know a lot about livestock but maybe someone can enlighten the situation.


I found references to the Spanish Missions in California (including Baja) having 150,000 sheep. Sheep are very hardy and adaptable. I have seen them in the Red Desert in Wyoming and the soggy wet Willamette Valley during Oregon winters. In the Western US they generally would go to the high country during the summer months. There are different breeds available for almost every habitat. The Spanish would have brought Merino's developed in the Mediterranean. They are graziers not browsers like goats. Sheep would prefer grass and herbaceous forbs.

I hope that I didn't suggest that rock walls would corral Bighorns. However I would imagine a rock wall could influence their behavior. For instance, perhaps the Natives built blinds and wanted the Bighorns to become accustomed to moving in certain patterns. They would throw up a rock wall and the Bighorns or other mammals might have avoided going near it, let alone over it.

I was thinking about the sleeping circles with shells. What a perfect place to drop off a herder. There was transportable fast food right at hand. ;)

DianaT - 1-17-2009 at 07:43 PM

It had to be great to find that site and to see it rather untouched, and the pictures showing how little the plants grow are very interesting.

Sharing all of this with Dr. Ritter is also great, but I really don't understand why you don't share the information with INAH.

I know you have not been happy with them in the past, but they are the official Mexican agency, and this site is in Mexico.

JMHO-- I know our friend who works for PROFEPA in protecting the preserve and the environment, likes working with official agencies from the US, but he does feel like the Mexican agencies should take the lead.

Diane





[Edited on 1-18-2009 by jdtrotter]

Sharksbaja - 1-17-2009 at 10:43 PM

Sorry David, that came out wrong I guess. Yes it would be kind of you to ask him. You understand info is always better from the "horses mouth" so to speak. I meant only that I'd like to discuss this with him personally. Afterall, he is the authority and I don't have a way to talk with him outside this forum.

Lately you have been jumped on a little but it's just the normal course the forum takes. The more you post the more you get stepped on. It's not that bad is it? I think the forum has been more civil than I've ever seen it, no?

Btw, who are these loonies?:lol:

Avid, I hear ya! My point was to see if there is any evidence of comingled artifacts or evidence that would support the fact that sheep were indeed part of the diet. Trying to figure out if habitation was limited to the circle builders or the more recent dwellers(wall builders?) who did have access to Spanish sheep. Certainly interesting to ponder those walls.




[Edited on 1-18-2009 by Sharksbaja]

David K - 1-17-2009 at 11:35 PM

Thanks Diane (for civil discussion here) and for the comment on the posts...

As for this: "Sharing all of this with Dr. Ritter is also great, but I really don't understand why you don't share the information with INAH."

The way I see it is first, the site was shared with the Baja world in July of 1966... I just went back for a new look once I knew were to go. The people of Mexico should know these places better than I, I had no way of knowing if they haven't already been there.

The site had no arrowheads, pottery, bones... or any 'artifacts' beyond the rocks and one shallow metate. In other words, it looks picked over.

Finally, if my numerous posts and photos here on Nomad and a couple of other Baja sites on the World Wide Web (plus a Discover Baja newsletter article in a future edition) isn't enough 'sharing' for INAH... Then ???

If you think I should notify them more directly, I will... no problema!

CLOSE UP of 'Chute/ Slide'

David K - 1-18-2009 at 12:07 AM

Here is a zoom in on that cleared 'chute' or slide that I thought may have been where supplies for the Spanish fort on top (or whatever was on top) were dragged or pulled up by rope...

This is very steep... we climbed up/ and back down just to the left of it, because using rocks to hold or step on seemed easier, it was that steep.



What do you think???

Here is the full image... note my Tacoma at the bottom for scale...



[Edited on 1-18-2009 by David K]

DianaT - 1-18-2009 at 09:45 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by David K
Thanks Diane (for civil discussion here) and for the comment on the posts...


You never miss a chance---well done.

Well it sounds like the site has been well picked over which is too bad. Maybe it has already been studied by the INAH or the like. The looting of these types of sites by locals, unfortunately, happens everywhere.

Regardless, finding something like that after so many years of looking for a specific site had to be fun.

David K - 1-18-2009 at 10:04 AM

It was... very much...! I wanted to see the place since I read about it in high school (when I bought Choral's 1973 book) and did a report on the Baja missions for my 11th grade California History class in 1975.

I utilized Choral's book for my report (mission photos) ... Got an A for it. So, in 1998 I contacted Choral to ask if she had extra copies so I could get a replacement... That is how our friendship statred. It was great, she was one of my 'Baja heroes'

Here is my worn and sacrificed copy:

pepper-73r.JPG - 22kB

David K - 1-18-2009 at 10:06 AM

Here is the 1975 revised edition... notice the slight change in the title? Choral didn't have any extras, so I found this one online.

Choral autographed them both for me.

pepper-75r.JPG - 27kB

DianaT - 1-18-2009 at 10:18 AM

Interesting picture of San Borja on the front of that book----good for comparison to today.

I am always a little ambivalent about missions. I love visiting old historical sites, and I have always enjoyed the missions in both Californias. The ambivalence comes from understanding the brutality of the system in regards to the indigenous populations.

I do cringe when I see the California 4th grade mission project done year after year, the one that the students used to do until the parents started competing. They teach such a fantasized version of that part of California history.

Good luck on finding more information about the wall, etc.

 Pages:  1