|  Pages:
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 ..
 8 | 
David K
 
Honored Nomad
          
 
 
Posts: 65350
 
Registered: 8-30-2002
 Location: San Diego County
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: Have Baja Fever
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
Is there a list what Bloomberg is considering "greenhouse gasses" and then we can see how many are natural (like water vapor, CO2 from living things,
volcanoes, etc. man has no control over) vs. "industrial". 
 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
gnukid
 
Ultra Nomad
      
 
 
 
Posts: 4411
 
Registered: 7-2-2006
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
Sill no evidence of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming ... yes the climate is changing both in consistent and unpredictable ways that have
little to do with human generated CO2 driving increasing temperature rise. If you have proof please share. 
 | 
| 
 | 
MrBillM
 
Platinum Nomad
         
 
 
 
Posts: 21656
 
Registered: 8-20-2003
 Location: Out and About
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: It's a Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah Day 
  
 
 | 
 | 
Feeling Comforted ? 
 
 
" .........Sill[sic] no evidence of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming ........." 
 
Assuming that positive proof might be forthcoming within decades .............. At that point, we'd be pretty well
SCREWED ! 
 
Right ?   
 
Sort of like waiting until THE BIG ONE arrives in California before making preparations.  
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
4x4abc
 
Ultra Nomad
      
 
 
Posts: 4443
 
Registered: 4-24-2009
 Location: La Paz, BCS
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: happy - always
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
like David said - you have to adapt when it happens 
 
 
 
 
Harald Pietschmann 
 | 
| 
 | 
caj13
 
Super Nomad
     
 
 
 
Posts: 1002
 
Registered: 8-1-2017
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 Quote: Originally posted by gnukid    |  | Sill no evidence of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming ... yes the climate is changing both in consistent and unpredictable ways that have
little to do with human generated CO2 driving increasing temperature rise. If you have proof please share.   |  
  
 
we already have,  numerous times,  numerous well documented sources,  scientific reports,  data,  graphs charts etc.  You either ignore those - 
(unless your not capable of understanding them?).   and then you post right wing blogs and opinion sites parotting talking points fabricated out of
mid air to satisfy your agenda and ego.  So,  time for you to actually produce some peer reviewed science, that backs up your contention that current
climate change has little to do with human generated CO2 driving temperature rise! 
 | 
| 
 | 
elgatoloco
 
Ultra Nomad
      
 
 
 
Posts: 4348
 
Registered: 11-19-2002
 Location: Yes
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
This October it will be 20 years since my wife and I snorkeled with Whale Sharks, Manta Rays and sea lions in La Paz on our honeymoon. We had a cabana
at Los Arcos for a week in between camping our way down and back up the peninsula. We are planning on spending our anniversary somewhere in Baja.
Maybe La Paz? Do they still snorkel there or are the seas too high?     
 
 
 
 
 MAGA 
marooons Are Governing America 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
caj13
 
Super Nomad
     
 
 
 
Posts: 1002
 
Registered: 8-1-2017
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
So for you conspiracy theorists about us scientists coming up with some sort of "secret plan" to keep our funding. 
 
Yup -  its true -  we hold a secret meeting every year.  In that meeting we make sure we are all in line with the mantras!   
 
1. Bigfoot does not exist 
2. WE actually did go to the moon 
3. The earth really is round 
4. Global warming is a thing. 
 
Us scientists are really good at keeping secrets and devising these plans!  in the case of  global warming,  we started all of that plan in motion in
1896 -  when Nobel award winning  Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius  worked out -  ooops i mean came up with this ridiculous idea that burning of
fossil fuels lead to  releasing CO2 into the atmosphere, and caused a greenhouse effect. 
 
and we have been working on this secret plan since then,  springing it on the world in the 1980s.    
 
man - we are really good at conspiring to screw the general public,  too bad so many geniuses are around and see through our plans and construct
conspiracy theories based on lack of evidence, as proof -  how cool is that! 
 | 
| 
 | 
elgatoloco
 
Ultra Nomad
      
 
 
 
Posts: 4348
 
Registered: 11-19-2002
 Location: Yes
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
caj13 - keep up the good work. It is appreciated. At least by this old white man.   
 
When it doubt - read signature below  
 
Peace, love, fish tacos!
 
 
 
 
 MAGA 
marooons Are Governing America 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
JoeJustJoe
 
Banned
 
 
 
 
Posts: 21045
 
Registered: 9-9-2010
 Location: Occupied Aztlan
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: Mad as hell
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
It's doubtful that Mark Twain said:  
 
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference" - Mark Twain 
 
And if Mark Twain, did actually say it, he probably ripped it off from a  fortune cookie, because you see it all over the place with different
variations and attributed to different people all over the world.  
 
Personally I like this variation better:  
 
"Do not argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."   
 
The first time you hear these quotes, it's actually profound and funny, but after you heard it thousands of times, it starts sounded like a stale
joke, and I cringe when someone writes in on a forum, thinking, " oh crap, not that stupid quote again!" 
 
Regarding the global warning deniers, somebody has to challenge them once in a while to  put up or shut up.  
 
I can not believe in 2019 we have people, usually old white people, deny irrefutable science that global warning is real, and it's mostly caused by
polluting mankind. We also have the vast majority of scientist about 96% who study global warming, confirm it's real, with the other 4% of scientist
selling their soul to the oil industry to confuse the issue.   
 
And then we have guys like 81 year old Barry A. claim he doesn't believe in anything he can't see, and go Trump!   
 
Really Barry A? 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
AKgringo
 
Elite Nomad
       
 
 
 
Posts: 6253
 
Registered: 9-20-2014
 Location: Anchorage, AK (no mas!)
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: Retireded
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
Can you imagine some visitor to La Paz doing an internet search about "Snorkeling in La Paz", and discovering this forum? 
 
What a treasure trove of information they will have at their disposal!    
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by AKgringo]
 
 
 
 
If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space! 
 
"Could do better if he tried!"  Report card comments from most of my grade school teachers.  Sadly, still true! 
 | 
| 
 | 
Barry A.
 
Select Nomad
        
 
 
 
Posts: 10007
 
Registered: 11-30-2003
 Location: Redding, Northern CA
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: optimistic
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 Quote: Originally posted by JoeJustJoe    |  It's doubtful that Mark Twain said:  
 
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference" - Mark Twain 
 
And if Mark Twain, did actually say it, he probably ripped it off from a  fortune cookie, because you see it all over the place with different
variations and attributed to different people all over the world.  
 
Personally I like this variation better:  
 
"Do not argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."   
 
The first time you hear these quotes, it's actually profound and funny, but after you heard it thousands of times, it starts sounded like a stale
joke, and I cringe when someone writes in on a forum, thinking, " oh crap, not that stupid quote again!" 
 
Regarding the global warning deniers, somebody has to challenge them once in a while to  put up or shut up.  
 
I can not believe in 2019 we have people, usually old white people, deny irrefutable science that global warning is real, and it's mostly caused by
polluting mankind. We also have the vast majority of scientist about 96% who study global warming, confirm it's real, with the other 4% of scientist
selling their soul to the oil industry to confuse the issue.   
 
And then we have guys like 81 year old Barry A. claim he doesn't believe in anything he can't see, and go Trump!   
 
Really Barry A? 
 
  
 
  |  
  
 
Well, JoJo, that is not exactly what I said, but close.  Yes, I take with a grain-of-salt what I "see" on the internet because there is so much of it
that is spin, misrepresented, and frankly just out of context, or worse, lies.  As for "Global warming"----yes, it's happening---I am not a denier.  I
just am not ready to bankrupt the world by taking extreme measures that will only effect the possible outcome by maybe 3%, being generous.    
 
 | 
| 
 | 
4x4abc
 
Ultra Nomad
      
 
 
Posts: 4443
 
Registered: 4-24-2009
 Location: La Paz, BCS
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: happy - always
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
so your kid is not well 
doctors have an idea of what the illness is 
no medication has been tried and tested yet 
but doctors are certain, a regiment of (unproven) treatments will make your kid better 
they recommend to take the chance 
 
You: "No, lets wait until the kid gets really sick - we'll do something then."
 
 
 
 
Harald Pietschmann 
 | 
| 
 | 
Barry A.
 
Select Nomad
        
 
 
 
Posts: 10007
 
Registered: 11-30-2003
 Location: Redding, Northern CA
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: optimistic
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
abc---------you are comparing one person (my kid) with "the world"?   What I would do or not do with my kids treatment is totally different (to me)
than what I think the world-body en masse  should do when confronted with a problem of this magnitude. Both situations are a gamble, but the stakes
are entirely different in scope.  There is positive scientific proof that we could be hit with an asteroid as it has happened before, but I don't
think disrupting and at least partially destroying the economies of the world would justify the expenditure necessary to possibly mitigate that
happening.   
 
 | 
| 
 | 
SFandH
 
Elite Nomad
       
 
 
 
Posts: 7431
 
Registered: 8-5-2011
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
  
 
What are you talking about? 
 
What does it have to do with climate change? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]
 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
Barry A.
 
Select Nomad
        
 
 
 
Posts: 10007
 
Registered: 11-30-2003
 Location: Redding, Northern CA
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: optimistic
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 Quote: Originally posted by SFandH    |    
 
What are you talking about? 
 
What does it have to do with climate change? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]  |  
  
 
 
What????  You'rer kidding, right?   To finance and  implement the various methods of combating "climate change" for even minimal effect is staggering,
and would consume much of the assets of the developed world, I understand.   
 
I am all for "alternative energy" development, but not the solutions proposed in the "Green New Deal" as I understand them.    
 | 
| 
 | 
SFandH
 
Elite Nomad
       
 
 
 
Posts: 7431
 
Registered: 8-5-2011
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 Quote: Originally posted by Barry A.    |   Quote: Originally posted by SFandH    |    
 
What are you talking about? 
 
What does it have to do with climate change? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]  |  
  
 
 
What????  You'rer kidding, right?   To finance and  implement the various methods of combating "climate change" for even minimal effect is staggering,
and would consume much of the assets of the developed world, I understand.   
   
  |  
  
 
You understand? Do tell. What are you talking about? What you said above explains nothing. Where are the costs? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]
 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
Barry A.
 
Select Nomad
        
 
 
 
Posts: 10007
 
Registered: 11-30-2003
 Location: Redding, Northern CA
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: optimistic
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 Quote: Originally posted by SFandH    |   Quote: Originally posted by Barry A.    |   Quote: Originally posted by SFandH    |    
 
What are you talking about? 
 
What does it have to do with climate change? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]  |  
  
 
 
What????  You'rer kidding, right?   To finance and  implement the various methods of combating "climate change" for even minimal effect is staggering,
and would consume much of the assets of the developed world, I understand.   
   
  |  
  
 
You understand? Do tell. What are you talking about? What you said above explains nothing. Where are the costs? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]  |  
  
 
We must be talking past each other.  I have no idea what you are saying, or asking.  (now I see your edit)----the "costs" are outlined in the "Green
New Deal", and they are staggering!!! most costs being in shifting from Carbon to Alternative sources soon. 
 | 
| 
 | 
SFandH
 
Elite Nomad
       
 
 
 
Posts: 7431
 
Registered: 8-5-2011
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
Good, now we're talking. So you believe global warming is caused by the burning of fossil fuels but are against spending large sums of money to move
away from fossil fuels and on to renewables? Is that true? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]
 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
del mar
 
Banned
 
 
 
 
Posts: 1057
 
Registered: 7-23-2016
 Location: the cantina of course
 
Member Is Offline
 Mood: lil' fuzzy
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 Quote: Originally posted by SFandH    |    
 
What are you talking about? 
 
What does it have to do with climate change? 
 
 
[Edited on 7-22-2019 by SFandH]  |  
  
 
climate change!    I thought we were talking about snorkeling in La Paz! 
 | 
| 
 | 
SFandH
 
Elite Nomad
       
 
 
 
Posts: 7431
 
Registered: 8-5-2011
 
Member Is Offline
  
 
 | 
 | 
 
 
that ended 5 pages back   
 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
|  Pages:
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 ..
 8 |