Originally posted by David K
Quote: | Originally posted by edm1
Quote: | Originally posted by DENNIS
Quote: | Originally posted by David K
It has been said that to surrender your liberty for security provides neither. |
"History of the Quote"
This statement was used as a motto on the title page of An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania. (1759) which was
attributed to Franklin in the edition of 1812, but in a letter of September 27, 1760 to David Hume, he states that he published this book and denies
that he wrote it, other than a few remarks that were credited to the Pennsylvania Assembly, in which he served. The phrase itself was first used in a
letter from that Assembly dated November 11, 1755 to the Governor of Pennsylvania. An article on the origins of this statement here includes a scan
that indicates the original typography of the 1759 document, which uses an archaic form of "s": "Thoſe who would give up Essential Liberty to
purchaſe a little Temporary Safety, deſerve neither Liberty nor Safety." Researchers now believe that a fellow diplomat by the name of
Richard Jackson is the primary author of the book. With the information thus far available the issue of authorship of the statement is not yet
definitely resolved, but the evidence indicates it was very likely Franklin, who in the Poor Richard's Almanack of 1738 is known to have written a
similar proverb: "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."
Many paraphrased variants derived from this saying have arisen and have usually been incorrectly attributed to Franklin:
"They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither."
"He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security."
"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither."
"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both."
"If we restrict liberty to attain security we will lose them both."
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
"He who gives up freedom for safety deserves neither."
"Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither." |
Very good Dennis!
DK, I pity the generation(s) after us, my offsprings and grandchild included, as today imho life in the US is inferior compared to 30 years ago at my
prime. Our children despite of the better beginnings and education just are not having the same quality of life that we had then. I don't know if it's
an isolated situation but I see often many young adults need parents' help to keep up with their needs, rather than the other way around during our
prime, when we were the ones helping our parents who hailed from the depression era. I'm afraid that as soon as the $ is displaced as the intenational
currency, the US will follow the fate of USSR. We won't be able to just print money. |
Art, you are so right on! Imagine our parents or grandparents being told that their 'children' need to be left on parent's health insurance until they
are 26!
If you are 26 and still dependent on your parents, that is just sad...
However, the truth is our economy is so devastated by an ever growing, and fat government and stifling regulations against business, many of our kids
make little more than entry level wages... even with college degrees or technical training. More stupid government/ less freedom and opportunity.
|