| Pages:
1
..
125
126
127
128 |
Cliffy
Super Nomad
Posts: 1000
Registered: 12-19-2013
Member Is Offline
|
|
"Tree huggers" is more generational than political
"Detrimental climate change"?
What's the detriment? Warmer air? More rain? Less snow?
SO what! The weather changes Has been for 5 billion years
Again- adapt or die
The tree is still there
You chose your position in life today by what YOU did yesterday
|
|
|
surabi
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9080
Registered: 5-6-2016
Member Is Online
|
|
"So what!" makes it patently obvious that you have zero understanding of the repercussions of climate change.
|
|
|
JZ
Select Nomad
Posts: 14318
Registered: 10-3-2003
Member Is Online
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by surabi  | | "So what!" makes it patently obvious that you have zero understanding of the repercussions of climate change. |
Why can't you get it through your thick skull that it's just a grift by politicians and their cronies to get rich and gain power? 
You have 60 years of evidence for god's sake. One crazy prediction after another has been proven wrong. 
[Edited on 3-23-2026 by JZ]
|
|
|
Tioloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5578
Registered: 7-30-2014
Member Is Online
|
|
It is great how the libs want to "follow the science". Why do they NEVER answer the question about all the failed predictions? Because they are ok
with the communist transfer of wealth. Sick people for sure.
|
|
|
mtgoat666
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 20778
Registered: 9-16-2006
Location: San Diego
Member Is Offline
Mood: Hot n spicy
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Tioloco | | It is great how the libs want to "follow the science". Why do they NEVER answer the question about all the failed predictions? Because they are ok
with the communist transfer of wealth. Sick people for sure. |
The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses. The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen,
and man is a primary cause. Timing of changes are are variable.
You cherry pick little things in pathetic attempt to discredit science.
This ignorant behavior is called confirmation bias. It is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms one's
pre-existing beliefs while ignoring, disregarding, or devaluing contradictory evidence. This psychological defect reinforces existing political
stances and creates a distorted, one-sided view of reality like that of penepoco and pee wee crybaby dumb dumb.
Woke!
Hands off!
“Por el bien de todos, primero los pobres.”
“...ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.” “My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America
will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.”
Pronoun: the royal we
|
|
|
JZ
Select Nomad
Posts: 14318
Registered: 10-3-2003
Member Is Online
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666 |
The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses.
The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen, and man is a primary cause. Timing of changes are are variable.
|
>> The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses.
Who made the predictions? Why are they trying to distract people?
>> The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen
This is 100% true.
>> Man is a primary cause
This is 100% unproven
What you left out is all of the data on the politicians using the CC as a fear tactic to get rich and gain power. Can you please comment on that?
|
|
|
mtgoat666
Platinum Nomad
Posts: 20778
Registered: 9-16-2006
Location: San Diego
Member Is Offline
Mood: Hot n spicy
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by JZ | | Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666 |
The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses.
The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen, and man is a primary cause. Timing of changes are are variable.
|
>> The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses.
Who made the predictions? Why are they trying to distract people?
>> The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen
This is 100% true.
>> Man is a primary cause
This is 100% unproven
What you left out is all of the data on the politicians using the CC as a fear tactic to get rich and gain power. Can you please comment on that?
|
Pee wee,
You failed law school and the bar. Also you apparently failed at getting basic layman’s grasp of HS science. Good thing MAGA offered you a safe
space for your ignorance to achieve it’s full potential!
[Edited on 3-23-2026 by mtgoat666]
Woke!
Hands off!
“Por el bien de todos, primero los pobres.”
“...ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.” “My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America
will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.”
Pronoun: the royal we
|
|
|
surabi
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9080
Registered: 5-6-2016
Member Is Online
|
|
There is no "data" on politicians "using climate change as a fear tactic to get rich and gain power". That's just more of your delusions and
disinformation.
And yes, it has been proven that human activity is the primary cause of rapidly increasing climate change. (Gotta love how you right wingers think you
know more than 90% of the world's climate scientists)
Try asking farmers if climate change and its rapid rate of change is just a "grift" by politicians. Try asking the people who have been displaced by
unprecedented floods, hurricanes, tornados and forest fires worldwide.
Coincidentally, I just had a long conversation this afternoon with a woman who was a guest of mine a year ago who just came back down and stopped by
for a visit. She works with a small think tank organization that advises the Canadian govt. on geo-political strategies related to climate change as
it affects the military and defense, as well as recently working with NATO. She said all this man-made climate change denial disinformation, parroted
word for word by the right wingers here, has been proven to have been started by the oil and gas industries.
Those are the people who have a vested interest in spreading climate change disinformation, so they can get even richer than they already are. You
right wingers have it totally backwards and fell hook line and sinker for the bs. Those oil and gas execs are laughing all the way to the bank, having
gotten all the ignorant, gullible right wingers to spread and amplify the propaganda for them that they created.
[Edited on 3-23-2026 by surabi]
[Edited on 3-23-2026 by surabi]
|
|
|
Tioloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5578
Registered: 7-30-2014
Member Is Online
|
|
And like clockwork, the libtards resort to condescension and insults when they are unable to answer basic questions about the validity of their
multiple failed predictions.
“The sky is falling! Give us your money and freedom and only we can stop it!”
As a wise Mexican once said, “Chupa mi verga”
|
|
|
Lee
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3632
Registered: 10-2-2006
Location: High in the Colorado Rockies
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Tioloco | | And like clockwork, the libtards resort to condescension and insults when they are unable to answer basic questions about the validity of their
multiple failed predictions. |
Who calls nomads ''libtards?''
Let me guess. Libtard refers to liberals and liberals refer to Democrats. Help me out here. YOU are a conservative and herein means you're a
Republican. Right?
Gotta quote goat:
| Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666 |
You guys are ignorant dolts to have no better response than to label climate change and efforts to mitigate change a “hoax” and “scam.”
|
US Marines: providing enemies of America an opportunity to die for their country since 1775.
What I say before any important decision.
F*ck it.
|
|
|
Tioloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5578
Registered: 7-30-2014
Member Is Online
|
|
Actually, Lee.....
I am specifically referring to the Socialists here on Nomads as libtards. Most Democrats have a lot more sense than to believe the government can and
will solve all the problems if you just give them more of your money.
Quoting goat puts your reputation as a decent human being in peril.
|
|
|
pacificobob
Super Nomad
Posts: 2357
Registered: 4-23-2006
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666 | | Quote: Originally posted by JZ | | Quote: Originally posted by mtgoat666 |
The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses.
The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen, and man is a primary cause. Timing of changes are are variable.
|
>> The predictions are a side show. They easily distract you ignoramuses.
Who made the predictions? Why are they trying to distract people?
>> The science is clear, change has happened, change will continue to happen
This is 100% true.
>> Man is a primary cause
This is 100% unproven
What you left out is all of the data on the politicians using the CC as a fear tactic to get rich and gain power. Can you please comment on that?
|
Pee wee,
You failed law school and the bar. Also you apparently failed at getting basic layman’s grasp of HS science. Good thing MAGA offered you a safe
space for your ignorance to achieve it’s full potential!
[Edited on 3-23-2026 by mtgoat666] |
Goat, your analysis is spot-on.
|
|
|
surabi
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9080
Registered: 5-6-2016
Member Is Online
|
|
The MAGAs who never matured past elementary school playground name-calling.
During the height of Covid, I was standing in the grocery store check-out line. There were signs at the entrance to the store saying masks were
required. There was an American couple behind me in the line-up who had their masks down around their necks. I had seen them enter the store with
masks, then immediately pull them down when they were in the store.
They were crowded up right next to me in the check-out line, when distancing was also required and everyone but them was adhering to that. I asked
them quietly and politely to please back up, as they weren't masked or respecting the distancing directive.
The guy instantly said, in a loud and aggressive voice, "DO YOU OWN THIS STORE?" I answered quietly- "Masks are required to shop here". He then pulled
out his phone and started filming me.
When I had paid and was wheeling my cart out to the car, they emerged not far behind me. They started screaming across the parking lot "LIBTARD,
LIBTARD".
|
|
|
SFandH
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7506
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
Libtard is a childish, derogatory term.
Climate deniers are a noisy minority who don't understand fundamental science.
|
|
|
Lee
Ultra Nomad
Posts: 3632
Registered: 10-2-2006
Location: High in the Colorado Rockies
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Tioloco | Actually, Lee.....
I am specifically referring to the Socialists here on Nomads as libtards. Most Democrats have a lot more sense than to believe the government can and
will solve all the problems if you just give them more of your money.
Quoting goat puts your reputation as a decent human being in peril. |
Not sure how socialists work. Socialists are libtards? Yeah don't see how giving money to either party solves anything.
Think everyone is decent here and I'm not goat but he's making lots of sense in some of his comments -- and writing is right up there with surabi.
And, Tio, your intelligence strays just a bit with dialogue. Still there, though. Thx for your input.
US Marines: providing enemies of America an opportunity to die for their country since 1775.
What I say before any important decision.
F*ck it.
|
|
|
surabi
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9080
Registered: 5-6-2016
Member Is Online
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by SFandH | | Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy |
And I have never denied that man has an affect on the climate
The only argument is how much and what will its long term affect be
Which at this point is only guess work. |
The word affect is a verb; the word effect is a noun. You have it backward.
[Edited on 3-22-2026 by SFandH] |
Not always, although in this case correct.
"Exceptions and Nuances:
Effect (Verb): Can mean to bring about or implement, usually in the phrase "effect change".
Affect (Noun): In psychology, this refers to an expressed emotion.
The defensive, dismissive response of the poor grammar poster is telling. When intelligent people have their grammar corrected, they are normally
appreciative, because they prefer not to sound uneducated.
|
|
|
Tioloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5578
Registered: 7-30-2014
Member Is Online
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Lee | | Quote: Originally posted by Tioloco | Actually, Lee.....
I am specifically referring to the Socialists here on Nomads as libtards. Most Democrats have a lot more sense than to believe the government can and
will solve all the problems if you just give them more of your money.
Quoting goat puts your reputation as a decent human being in peril. |
Not sure how socialists work. |
You are not sure how socialists work? Well, your problem has now been identified. Plenty of historical disasters for you to read up on. Need
references?
Liberal + retard = libtard
|
|
|
surabi
Elite Nomad
Posts: 9080
Registered: 5-6-2016
Member Is Online
|
|
Plenty of present day examples of how successful countries with Social Democracies are, with high standards of living, education, and medical care,
low crime and poverty rates.
"Key Social Democracies and Influenced Nations:
Nordic Model Countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden are considered high-socialism models (known as the Nordic model), emphasizing high public
spending, union participation, and universal welfare.
European Nations: Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, and Portugal often feature coalition governments led by social democratic parties,
resulting in strong social safety nets.
Other Examples: Countries such as Canada, New Zealand, and Great Britain often experience significant social democratic influence through social
programs, labor union activity, and left-leaning political parties."
Loco chooses to be willfully ignorant, refusing to understand the difference between Social Democracy and Communism, apparently not knowing that
social democracies do not mean everything is owned by the govt. and all resources distributed equally, but are also capitalist systems which support
free enterprise.
[Edited on 3-23-2026 by surabi]
|
|
|
SFandH
Elite Nomad
Posts: 7506
Registered: 8-5-2011
Member Is Offline
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by surabi | | Quote: Originally posted by SFandH | | Quote: Originally posted by Cliffy |
And I have never denied that man has an affect on the climate
The only argument is how much and what will its long term affect be
Which at this point is only guess work. |
The word affect is a verb; the word effect is a noun. You have it backward.
[Edited on 3-22-2026 by SFandH] |
Not always, although in this case correct.
"Exceptions and Nuances:
Effect (Verb): Can mean to bring about or implement, usually in the phrase "effect change".
Affect (Noun): In psychology, this refers to an expressed emotion.
|
Correct you are. I should have started my sentence with the phrase "Most commonly."
|
|
|
Tioloco
Elite Nomad
Posts: 5578
Registered: 7-30-2014
Member Is Online
|
|
sabionda and SFH-
Those socialist leaning democracies you mentioned are in tough shape today.
NONE of them are able to defend themselves militarily without their dependence on the USA military. That has been proven this last year.
Some of them are now trying to maneuver their way out of the social spending and toward a more robust military budget.
Left wingers like you only see butterflies and unicorns.
NYC (Mamdani)is going to be a beautiful example of how your ideology is a huge failure. Newsom has already shown how bad the policies are. Governor
Hochul is eating her words but it is too late. You clowns aren't responsible enough to make decisions like Trump has to make now. The cleanup has a
big price-tag in both dollars and blood.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
..
125
126
127
128 |
![[*]](images/xmbforum/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
