BajaNomad
Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom
Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4
Author: Subject: Baseball playoffs-baja trip in delay mode
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 8088
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-24-2010 at 10:00 AM


I think that if the Giants pitch like they did in the Atlanta series Santiago will be a happy man.

If the Giants had pitched the way they did against the Phils they would have never gotten past Atlanta.

If 3 of their 4 starters play to their full potential they should take Texas. But Sanchez is struggling. Lincecum isn't in top form either.

One thing's for sure, if Boche had been coaching the Giants in the 2002 World Series they would have been champs. Did you see him pull Lincecum after 1 out? The man is fearless. Baker keeps Lincecum in because of his reputation. BTW, Alex and I watched the 2002 World Series at that pizza parlor in St. Rosalia, the one with Marilyn Monroe on the wall. I'll never forget that 8th inning home run in game 6.

We get nothing but Giants baseball on the tube. It's hard to be a Dodger fan when all you get are their box scores in the morning paper.
View user's profile
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9011
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-24-2010 at 10:48 AM


You probably mean the SEVENTH inning home run hit by Spiezio; the 3 run shot in game 6? That made it 5-3, Giants still leading.

Darin Erstad DID hit a homer in the in the 8th but that was a solo shot and only made the score 5-4, Giants still leading. Then came the single to center by Salmon, the bloop double to left by Garret Anderson that Bonds stereoided out thighs wouldnt allow him to get to, and then the ringing double up the alley by Glaus (again, past the pumped up Bonds) for the lead. After that comeback, facing elimination, the 4-1 win the following day seemed SOOOO anticlimactic. It really wasn't a very exciting game.

I think the edge Texas has is that 2 of the 4 Giant starters are lefties, which plays well into Texas' strength; Vlad, Michael Young, Cruz, Bengie, Elvis, Kinsler. Hamilton hits everyone, so that doesnt matter.

If Cliff Lee can shut down the Yankees and the Rays, he should get his two wins against the weaker Giant hitters. That leaves the Giants having to win when Sanchez and Bumgardner pitch. Not a very likely scenario.

My sleeper pick for Series MVP...........Mitch Moreland.

[Edited on 10-24-2010 by Hook]




View user's profile
toneart
Ultra Nomad
*****




Posts: 4901
Registered: 7-23-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: Skeptical

[*] posted on 10-24-2010 at 11:09 AM


The Giants won last night the way they always win...painfully. Barely squeeking by with one-run wins is what they do, causing agonizing suspense and pain to the San Francisco fans.

In the Series with the Rangers, it should be more of the same. I do think the deep bullpen and Bochy will make the difference in the end. Like the playoffs, the games seem to hinge on the breaks, and avoiding errors. There is such parity this year. Any game in any series could go either way.

So, fill yer pipe. Enjoy. Baja will be there waiting for you when the Giants finally win the World Series. Peace Out!:spingrin::tumble::cool:

The Tonester :smug:




View user's profile
Santiago
Ultra Nomad
*****




Posts: 3531
Registered: 8-27-2003
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-24-2010 at 11:48 AM


It's hard to argue against Hook's analysis, so I won't. He and Igor are fundamentally correct; the Giants don't really have much of a chance. But this year, things just seemed to break their way when they needed it. We wouldn't even be having this discussion if SD hadn't gone 0 for 10 in Sept. We're going to Costco today to lay in 7 games worth of brats, beer, ribs and all the fixings. My buddy's got his new fancy smancy TV all ready. I've got my voice mail recording set up so customers know why I'm not answering the phone. I've bought enough tissue to get through the eventual outcome as I weep in victory and defeat. SWMBO has enough D cell batteries to get her through the next 2 weeks as apparently I'm useless whenever my team's in the series.
Me and my house?.... we're ready.
View user's profile
bajafreaks
Nomad
**




Posts: 412
Registered: 3-27-2007
Location: Gardnerville, NV./ Los Barriles BCS
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Bad Days !!!

[*] posted on 10-24-2010 at 01:39 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by nobaddays
The Giants WILL choke


They're choking on their Champagne :lol:

[Edited on 10-25-2010 by bajafreaks]
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 8088
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-24-2010 at 01:46 PM


I didn't say the Giants don't have much of a chance.

Three of the four best pitchers in that series wear a Giants uniform. Even with 2 Lee victories they still need two more, and I don't believe he will get 2 wins to begin with.

Hook mentioned the weaker hitting of Philadelphia and Atlanta. The hitting always looks weak when it's neutralized by good pitching. All those hall of famers, Mays, McCovey, and Cepeda amounted to nothing when they faced Koufax and Drysdale. Similarly, the Texans will mysteriously go into a hitting slump in the World Series.

The Giants have a great chance if Lincecum, Caine, and Sanchez bring their A games. But all three have to be right on and that has seldom happened. We need a 'Perfect Storm' <groan>.
View user's profile
Martyman
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 1904
Registered: 9-10-2004
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-25-2010 at 08:09 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by Hook
The same could be said of Texas (Tampa and NY) but I think the Rangers are by far the better hitting team and the starting pitching is about even.



The starting pitching is about even? There you are wrong my friend.
The braves and phils wern't slumping until they met the Gigantes. Good pitching will beat good hitting most days.

I'm going to game one on Wednesday. Trip delayed til Nov 5.
View user's profile
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9011
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-25-2010 at 03:03 PM


Braves hadn't hit all year. Phils improved a bit in September but were still underachieving according to their manager, Charlie Manuel, during his post-series interviews. He stated emphatically that lack of hitting was the biggest problem the Phils had this year.

Texas has hit well all year AND they FINALLY have all their players healthy, for the first time since April.

I just dont think the Giants can keep up this "garbage" method of scoring runs. Or, if they do, it wont be enough runs to outscore the Rangers.

[Edited on 10-25-2010 by Hook]




View user's profile
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 8088
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-25-2010 at 07:28 PM


Hook,

Here are the stats from game 6.

San Francisco 002 000 010 — 3 13 0
Philadelphia 200 000 000 — 2 8 1

There's a lot of talk about the Giants being 'lucky'. As I see it had the Phillies won that would have been lucky as they had half the hits the Giants had. In fact, you could argue that getting 3 runs for 13 hits is actually pretty 'unlucky'.

No, the Giants are for real. They've a two-time Cy Young winner and a no-hit pitcher in their starting rotation.

But what do I know.

I was sure Sonny Liston was gonna knock the bejeezus out of Cassius Clay.

I was sure the Baltimore Colts were gonna were going to stomp on Namath's Jets.

I said that Lee couldn't win the series for the Rangers by hisself (I think they talk that way in Texas), but then I remembered what Hershiser did to the A's.
View user's profile
krafty
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 1052
Registered: 8-23-2010
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-25-2010 at 08:24 PM


We are Yankee fans, and them Texans looked GOOD!
View user's profile
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9011
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-25-2010 at 09:28 PM


Well, I guess this is why they play the games............to settle it once and for all.

:bounce:




View user's profile
Martyman
Super Nomad
****




Posts: 1904
Registered: 9-10-2004
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 09:12 AM


If the Giants win game one today...its over! Giants in five.
View user's profile
durrelllrobert
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 7393
Registered: 11-22-2007
Location: Punta Banda BC
Member Is Offline

Mood: thriving in Baja

[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 09:21 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by Skipjack Joe


One thing's for sure, if Boche had been coaching the Giants in the 2002 World Series they would have been champs..

not as exiciting as the 1989 series :lol::lol:




Bob Durrell
View user's profile
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9011
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 10:59 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by Martyman
If the Giants win game one today...its over! Giants in five.


That would mean they would win both games Cliff Lee starts.

Now, THAT'S a bold prediction!




View user's profile
Bajahowodd
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9274
Registered: 12-15-2008
Location: Disneyland Adjacent and anywhere in Baja
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 01:33 PM


Biggest loser: Fox. Predictions are that this series will have some of the lowest ratings seen in a long, long time. One cause is that the Giants are in it. LA, being the second largest media market in the country is chock full of Giant haters. So ratings should be in the basement in LA.

Personally, I don't get how anyone could "hate" a sports team. But, that's how the media reports it.
View user's profile
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 8088
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 08:38 PM


Quote:
Originally posted by Hook

That would mean they would win both games Cliff Lee starts.

Now, THAT'S a bold prediction!


Errr.... You were saying?
View user's profile
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9011
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 08:44 PM


Havent been proved wrong yet.

Lee had only three of his four pitches tonight. I think he got exactly ONE curveball over for a strike. The Giants really didnt have to adjust to much change of speed. And they took advantage of it. Very good hitting night by the Giants.

[Edited on 10-28-2010 by Hook]




View user's profile
Skipjack Joe
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 8088
Registered: 7-12-2004
Location: Bahia Asuncion
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 09:23 PM


Yes, but the prediction isn't as bold anymore.

Anyway, I was going to ask you, Hook. Have you noticed how often the Giants hit balls down the right and left field lines? I'm thinking the hitters must be actually trying to do that because it seems as though every 3rd hit is of that nature. Ever hear of such a strategy?

P.S. Santiago is going to sleep well tonight. :lol:

[Edited on 10-28-2010 by Skipjack Joe]
View user's profile
toneart
Ultra Nomad
*****




Posts: 4901
Registered: 7-23-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: Skeptical

[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 09:49 PM


There was no pain in San Francisco tonight....................except for the hurt the Giants put on the Rangers. :smug::bounce:



View user's profile
Hook
Elite Nomad
******




Posts: 9011
Registered: 3-13-2004
Location: Sonora
Member Is Offline

Mood: Inquisitive

[*] posted on 10-27-2010 at 10:24 PM


Only a very few really good hitters have so much bat control that they can put a ball along the line whenever they want to. Rod Carew comes to mind. Matty Alou was another; you older Giant fans will remember him. These were both what are referred to as "slap" hitters, i.e.' they can slap the ball anywhere it's pitched. Slap hitters are usually not home run hitters.

The number of balls hit down the lines is usually coincidental. But, yes, there were quite a few of them tonight. Most of the Giants hits down the line were due to being slightly "out in front" of a lot of pitches. If, as a batter, you EXACTLY time your swing to the exact moment the pitch is crossing the mid section of the plate, then theoretically the ball will go up the middle of the diamond somewhere. Being "out in front" of a ball means you're swinging just slightly early. The ball can still remain fair but it wont go up the middle of the diamond. If you're too much out in front, the ball likely will go way foul OR you can be so out in front that your bat crosses the plate before the ball get there.

With Cliff Lee unable to command (throw for a strike) his curveball tonight, he was reluctant to use it. All his other pitches were in the 88-92 mph range. This simplified the task for the Giant hitters. With no curveballs likely to be thrown (curves are generally in the 70-80 mph range), timing the bat to the speed of the pitch became easier. It is harder to hit 88-92 mph pitches, when an occasional 70-80 mph pitch is included. Your timing as a hitter gets thrown off by seeing pitches of vastly different speeds, back to back.

And as with most things in life, timing is everything.




View user's profile
 Pages:  1  2    4

  Go To Top

 






All Content Copyright 1997- Q87 International; All Rights Reserved.
Powered by XMB; XMB Forum Software © 2001-2014 The XMB Group






"If it were lush and rich, one could understand the pull, but it is fierce and hostile and sullen. The stone mountains pile up to the sky and there is little fresh water. But we know we must go back if we live, and we don't know why." - Steinbeck, Log from the Sea of Cortez

 

"People don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care." - Theodore Roosevelt

 

"You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them or to them." - Malcolm Forbes

 

"Let others lead small lives, but not you. Let others argue over small things, but not you. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you." - Jim Rohn

 

"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer." - Cunningham's Law







Thank you to Baja Bound Mexico Insurance Services for your long-term support of the BajaNomad.com Forums site.







Emergency Baja Contacts Include:

Desert Hawks; El Rosario-based ambulance transport; Emergency #: (616) 103-0262